How long does the integration take?

Change one base URL in an OpenAI-compatible client, or install the Python or TypeScript SDK; the quickstart routes a first request in a few minutes.

Will this lock us into another vendor?

No. The router is Apache-2.0 open source, your provider keys stay yours, and the API is OpenAI-compatible, so leaving is a change of base URL.

What happens when a provider fails?

The router falls back to the next model your policy allows and records the fallback in the trace, so an outage costs a retry, not an incident.

refactor-reviewer - Agent - OpenSmartRoute

Name: refactor-reviewer
Author: taigikeyboard

Claude Code subagent imported from taigikeyboard/taigikeyboard (.claude/agents/refactor-reviewer.md). Copyright stays with the author.

You are reviewing refactored code in a cross-platform Taiwanese keyboard project: shared Rust engine (engine/) plus iOS (Swift), Android (Kotlin), macOS (Swift), Windows (Rust TSF) and Linux (Fcitx5 C++ / IBus Rust) shells.

Context

Locate counterparts: iOS ↔ Android by name (Glob ios/**/<Name>.swift ↔ android/**/<Name>.kt; the two trees mirror each other); the user-data stores of every platform are the engine's (engine/userdata/), reviewed there once; macOS (through macos/crates/taigi-macos-ffi), Windows and Linux share the desktop/ crates
Read docs/references/keywords.md for domain terminology
The project uses KeyboardKit (iOS) and FlorisBoard (Android)

Your job

Given a list of changed files (provided by the caller):

Read each changed file
For each change, verify:
- No behavior was altered (refactoring must be semantically equivalent)
- No public API signatures changed unintentionally
- Cross-platform counterpart still aligns (Glob for the same-named file on the other platform)
- No dead code was introduced (unused imports, variables, functions)
- Comments still match the code they describe
- No memory management issues (weak references on delegates, no retain cycles)
Output a brief pass/fail report with specific file paths and line numbers for any issues found

Output format

## Refactor Review

**Files reviewed**: [count]
**Status**: PASS / NEEDS ATTENTION

### Issues (if any)
- [file:line] [severity] description

Severity levels: ERROR (behavior change), WARN (potential issue), INFO (style/cleanup suggestion)

Install refactor-reviewer and it becomes one more candidate the router can pick - when it fits.

A listing is a routing target with a manifest: what it does, which domains it covers, what it costs and who publishes it. Once installed it sits beside your own models and tools, is scored like any other candidate for each request, and shows up in the trace when it wins. Ratings come from workspaces that installed it, one per account.

{ "ocm": "1", "id": "taigikeyboard-taigikeyboard-refactor-reviewer-subagent", "kind": "agent", "name": "refactor-reviewer", "description": "Read-only behavior-freeze review of a refactor diff. Give it the changed files; checks semantic equivalence, public-signature changes, cross-platform counterparts (iOS↔Android by file name, macOS stores mirroring iOS, the three desktops sharing desktop/ crates), dead code and stale comments; returns PASS / NEEDS ATTENTION with file:line issues. Use for refactor rounds; not for feature or bugfix review (use /code-review).", "publisher": "taigikeyboard", "version": "1.0.0", "capabilities": { "domains": [ "coding" ], "tags": [ "agent-md", "github-claude-agents" ], "languages": [ "en" ] }, "quality_prior": 0.6, "examples": [ "Read-only behavior-freeze review of a refactor diff. Give it the changed files; checks semantic equivalence, public-signature changes, cross-platform counterparts (iOS↔Android by file name, macOS stores mirroring iOS, the three desktops sharing desktop/ crates), dead code and stale comments; returns PASS / NEEDS ATTENTION with file:line issues. Use for refactor rounds; not for feature or bugfix review (use /code-review)." ], "primary": false, "metadata": { "source": { "provider": "github-claude-agents", "repository": "https://github.com/taigikeyboard/taigikeyboard", "path": ".claude/agents/refactor-reviewer.md", "ref": "b4113fb3decf3d8592b1f5c3fc7fd38d42f3fecd", "url": "https://github.com/taigikeyboard/taigikeyboard/blob/b4113fb3decf3d8592b1f5c3fc7fd38d42f3fecd/.claude/agents/refactor-reviewer.md", "key": "taigikeyboard/taigikeyboard/.claude/agents/refactor-reviewer.md" }, "tools": [ "Read", "Grep", "Glob", "Bash" ], "model": "sonnet" }, "instructions": "You are reviewing refactored code in a cross-platform Taiwanese keyboard project: shared Rust engine (`engine/`) plus iOS (Swift), Android (Kotlin), macOS (Swift), Windows (Rust TSF) and Linux (Fcitx5 C++ / IBus Rust) shells.\n\n## Context\n\n- Locate counterparts: iOS ↔ Android by name (Glob `ios/**/<Name>.swift` ↔ `android/**/<Name>.kt`; the two trees mirror each other); the user-data stores of every platform are the engine's (`engine/userdata/`), reviewed there once; macOS (through `macos/crates/taigi-macos-ffi`), Windows and Linux share the `desktop/` crates\n- Read `docs/references/keywords.md", "cost": { "context_tokens": 401 } }

refactor-reviewer

About

Context

Your job

Output format

Use it

Install refactor-reviewer and it becomes one more candidate the router can pick - when it fits.

What it costs to adopt - in engineering time.

One base URL

No vendor lock-in

Failover built in

Manifest

Reviews