Imported from shipshitdev/skills (
skills/interview/SKILL.md). Install upstream withnpx skills add shipshitdev/skills --skill interview. Copyright stays with the author.
Interview
Run a focused discovery interview before creating a PRD, writing a plan, shaping
UX, or starting implementation. Ground in the repo first, then run grilling for
the decisions that cannot be inferred.
This skill does not write code, create issues, or produce a final PRD by default. It produces an interview brief. Recommend the next skill; do not invoke another user-invoked skill.
Contract
Inputs:
- Rough feature idea, issue number, product decision, bug class, or architecture question.
- Optional docs, links, transcripts, screenshots, or existing tracker context.
Outputs:
- Concise context scan summary.
- Settled decisions from
grilling. - Final interview brief ready for
prd-writer,feature-intake,shape,spec-first, or direct implementation.
Creates/Modifies:
- None by default.
- May write tracker comments, PRD bodies, or memory files only when explicitly requested after the interview.
External Side Effects:
- None by default.
- Reads local repo context and, when needed, tracker or linked documentation.
- Writes external systems only after explicit approval.
Confirmation Required:
- Before creating or editing GitHub issues, PRDs, comments, memory files, or other durable artifacts.
Delegates To:
grillingfor the design-tree interview (frontier rounds, recommended answers).domain-modelingwhen a term crystallizes or conflicts withCONTEXT.md.
Recommend next (do not invoke): prd-writer, feature-intake, shape,
spec-first, prd-quality-gate.
When To Use
- A user asks for
/interview, "grill me", "grill me with docs", or equivalent. - A feature idea is too vague to turn directly into a PRD.
- Existing repo docs probably answer part of the question, but missing decisions still need the user.
Skip this skill when:
- The user already provided a complete PRD or issue with acceptance criteria.
- The request is a small, obvious edit and the user said to implement directly.
- The only missing context is discoverable from the repo with no user decision.
Workflow
1. Ground In Repo Context
Read repo context before asking questions:
- Start with
.agents/README.mdwhen present. - Read relevant
.agents/memory/files, especially.agents/memory/memory.md,.agents/memory/context.md, and any task-relevant.agents/memory/system/docs. - Read
CONTEXT.md/CONTEXT-MAP.mdanddocs/agents/domain.mdwhen present. - Check recent
.agents/sessions/entries only when they are relevant to the topic. - Read the applicable
AGENTS.override.md/AGENTS.mdchain for routing and repo rules. ReadCLAUDE.mdwhen the active workflow is Claude-specific. - Search docs, README files, source code, and issues for the topic before asking the user to repeat known context.
Do not look for a local plans directory under .agents; plans live on GitHub
issues and PR comments.
When the user provides external docs or says "with docs", read only the relevant sections and keep a short source list for the final brief.
2. State What Is Known
Before asking questions, summarize the context scan in three compact bullets:
- What the repo already says.
- What is still ambiguous.
- Which downstream artifact this interview is likely feeding.
If the repo gives enough context, ask for confirmation instead of running a long interview.
3. Run grilling
Run the grilling skill on the remaining decisions. It owns the design tree,
the frontier, recommended answers, and the facts-vs-decisions split.
When a term is resolved or conflicts with CONTEXT.md, run domain-modeling
inline.
4. Stop At The Right Time
Stop when one of these is true:
- The grilling frontier is empty and the brief can feed the next skill.
- Remaining questions are implementation details for the planner or executor.
- The user says "enough", "write it", "make the PRD", or equivalent.
- A blocker requires a separate research pass, stakeholder decision, or external access.
Final Interview Brief
End with this structure:
## Interview Brief: <topic>
### Context Read
- <files, issues, docs, or links used>
### Problem And User
<who has the problem, where it appears, and why it matters>
### Desired Outcome
<what must be true after the work ships>
### Version-One Scope
- <included behavior or decision>
### Non-Goals
- <explicitly excluded behavior or decision>
### Constraints And Dependencies
- <technical, business, timing, data, security, or UX constraints>
### Acceptance Signals
- <reviewable or testable completion signal>
### Risks And Open Questions
- <unresolved item, or "None">
### Recommended Next Step
<prd-writer | feature-intake | shape | spec-first | direct implementation>
Keep the brief concise enough to paste into a tracker issue or hand to a PRD writer. Include inference notes when a fact came from repo context rather than direct user confirmation.
Tell the user to run the recommended next skill. Do not fire it.
Anti-Patterns
- Dump a long questionnaire before reading repo context.
- Turn the interview into a PRD unless the user asks.
- Ask questions whose answers are already in
.agents/memory/, root agent files, docs, code, or tracker context. - Save plans in local agent plan files.
- Start implementation during the interview.
- Invoke another user-invoked skill from this one.