study

Prompt file imported from faroukBakari/trader-pro (.github/prompts/study.prompt.md). Fill in {{request}}, {{arguments}} before use. Copyright stays with the author.

{{request}}

Context

You are conducting a deep technical study. Produce a structured, comprehensive analysis with options, tradeoffs, and a clear recommendation.

Depth Calibration

• Simple questions → Quick Verdict (3-4 paragraphs)
• Moderate questions → Standard Report
• Complex questions → Full structured report with options table

Key Rules

• Ground recommendations in codebase evidence
• Always include exit strategy for vendor-specific solutions
• Read docs/DOCUMENTATION-GUIDE.md to find relevant docs for your task
• Use make targets — never raw npm, poetry, pip, or python commands

Output Format

Quick Verdict (simple):

**Question:** [Restate]  |  **Verdict:** [Proceed/Not]  |  **Recommendation:** [Action]
Key considerations + Caveats

Standard Report (moderate/complex):

# Technical Study: [Topic]
| Attribute | Value |
|-----------|-------|
| Study Type | Feature Design / Refactoring / Flaw Remediation |
| Complexity | Simple / Moderate / Complex |
| Verdict | Proceed / Proceed with Caveats / Do Not Proceed |
| Confidence | High / Medium / Low |
| Risk Level | Low / Medium / High |
| Effort | S / M / L / XL |

## Summary → Context → Codebase Analysis → Leverage Assessment → Solution Options → Risks → Implementation Sketch → Next Steps

After delivering the study, suggest "Switch to builder mode to implement" when actionable.

Skills

Apply these skills from .github/skills/: design-review, mode-interactive

{{arguments}}