Imported from ericrisco/rsc-harness (
skills/vllm/SKILL.md). Install upstream withnpx skills add ericrisco/rsc-harness --skill vllm. Copyright stays with the author.
vLLM — high-throughput serving of open-weight models
vLLM is the inference engine you put in front of an open-weight model when many requests hit it at
once. Its job — and this skill's — is throughput under concurrency: keep the GPU busy across dozens of
simultaneous requests, not squeeze one prompt out fast. You own the vllm serve flags; the box those
flags run on is a runpod/modal concern.
Why not just loop a transformers generate()? Naive serving runs one request at a time and pads
every batch to the longest sequence, so the GPU idles. vLLM fixes both:
- PagedAttention stores the KV cache in non-contiguous fixed-size blocks (like OS virtual-memory paging), so there is almost no padding/reservation waste and long contexts pack tightly.
- Continuous batching admits and retires requests token-by-token instead of per-batch, so a new request joins the running batch immediately rather than waiting for the slowest one to finish.
Net effect: an order-of-magnitude more concurrent throughput than single-request serving. If you only
ever have one user on a laptop, that machinery is wasted — that is ollama, not this.
Version & setup reality (verify at author time — vLLM ships ~weekly)
- Latest stable is ~0.25.x (July 2026) — releases land roughly weekly. Check PyPI / releases; do not pin to a number you read here.
- The V1 engine is the default since v0.8.0 and recent releases have removed the legacy V0 path,
so treat V1 as the only engine. It runs the scheduler + core loop in a separate process and turns on
chunked prefill and prefix caching out of the box, so you rarely tune the scheduler by hand
(V1 guide, accessed 2026-07).
VLLM_USE_V1historically toggled it — if you see it referenced, it is legacy. - Install:
pip install vllm(default build is CUDA/NVIDIA). ROCm, CPU, TPU and other backends have separate install paths — see the docs' installation matrix. Needs Python + a supported GPU. - Auth is OFF by default. A bare
vllm serveis an open endpoint on0.0.0.0:8000. To require a bearer token, pass--api-key <KEY>(or setVLLM_API_KEY); clients then sendAuthorization: Bearer <KEY>. Do not expose an unauthenticated server publicly.
vllm serve → an OpenAI-compatible server
vllm serve Qwen/Qwen3-8B # download from HF (or a local path) and serve on :8000
vllm serve /models/qwen3-8b --api-key sk-local-xyz --port 8000 --host 0.0.0.0
The server speaks the OpenAI wire protocol, so any OpenAI client works unchanged — just repoint
base_url and use a dummy (or your --api-key) key. Endpoints
(online serving docs, accessed 2026-07):
| Endpoint | Purpose |
|---|---|
POST /v1/chat/completions |
chat protocol (messages array) — the usual path |
POST /v1/completions |
raw text completion (single prompt string) |
GET /v1/models |
list the served model + any loaded LoRA adapters |
POST /v1/embeddings |
only for an embedding model (--task embed) |
GET /health |
liveness — 200 when ready, no auth, no body |
GET /metrics |
Prometheus metrics (queue depth, throughput, cache usage) |
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI(base_url="http://localhost:8000/v1", api_key="sk-local-xyz") # key = your --api-key
r = client.chat.completions.create(
model="Qwen/Qwen3-8B", # the id `/v1/models` reports (or a LoRA adapter name)
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Name three primes."}],
)
print(r.choices[0].message.content)
The model field must match what /v1/models returns — the served model id or a LoRA adapter name
(below), not an arbitrary string.
Parallelism: fit the model, then scale out
Two orthogonal knobs. Reach for parallelism only when the model does not fit one GPU — a model that fits should stay on a single GPU (no split), because every split adds communication overhead.
--tensor-parallel-size N— shard each layer's weights across N GPUs on one node. Use this first: it needs fast intra-node links (NVLink / PCIe) because GPUs sync every layer.Nmust divide the model's attention-head count. This is how you serve a model too big for one GPU but fitting the node.--pipeline-parallel-size M— split the model by layer stages across M nodes. Tolerates slower inter-node network. Use it when the model does not fit even a full node.
Rule of thumb from the docs (parallelism & scaling, accessed 2026-07): set tensor-parallel = GPUs per node, pipeline-parallel = number of nodes.
vllm serve meta-llama/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct --tensor-parallel-size 4 # 1 node, 4 GPUs
vllm serve <huge-model> --tensor-parallel-size 8 --pipeline-parallel-size 2 # 2 nodes × 8 GPUs
Multi-node needs a Ray cluster wired up first — that orchestration is a runpod/modal concern, not a
vLLM flag.
Quantization: smaller weights ≠ automatic speedup
Quantization shrinks the weights so a model fits fewer/smaller GPUs and frees VRAM for KV cache. Select
a method with --quantization (often auto-detected from the checkpoint's config). vLLM supports
AWQ, GPTQ/GPTQModel, FP8 (W8A8), compressed-tensors (LLM Compressor), INT4/INT8, bitsandbytes and
more (quantization docs, accessed 2026-07).
vllm serve TheModel/Qwen3-8B-AWQ --quantization awq
vllm serve neuralmagic/Model-FP8 --quantization compressed-tensors # FP8 needs Ada/Hopper+
The honest tradeoffs:
- Support is GPU-arch-specific — FP8 W8A8 wants Ada/Hopper-class (or AMD) hardware; a method that is fast on one GPU may be unsupported or emulated on another. Check the compatibility table.
- Quant is a memory win, not a guaranteed throughput win. At low batch / low concurrency the workload is memory-bandwidth-bound and a quant can help; but dequant overhead can cost latency, and at high batch you may be compute-bound where a weight-only quant does little. Benchmark your quant on your hardware at your real concurrency before assuming it is faster.
- Quality drops — usually small for 8-bit/well-calibrated 4-bit, larger for aggressive 4-bit. Serve
a quant to save VRAM, not as a free lunch. Picking which quantized checkpoint to pull is an
open-weightsdecision.
LoRA adapters: serve the fine-tuning output
vLLM serves LoRA adapters on top of one loaded base model, so your finetuning/unsloth output goes
live without merging or a second server
(LoRA docs, accessed 2026-07).
vllm serve meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct \
--enable-lora \
--lora-modules sql=/adapters/sql-lora legal=/adapters/legal-lora \
--max-loras 2 \ # how many adapters resident at once
--max-lora-rank 16 # must be >= the rank the adapter was trained at
Route to an adapter by naming it in the request model field: "model": "sql" hits the SQL adapter,
"model": "meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct" hits the untuned base — same server, no reload.
Load/unload at runtime with VLLM_ALLOW_RUNTIME_LORA_UPDATING=True, then
POST /v1/load_lora_adapter / POST /v1/unload_lora_adapter. Base + adapter must match (same family
and dims), and --max-lora-rank must be ≥ the trained rank or load fails.
Memory & throughput: where OOM comes from
The two knobs that cause (and cure) most OOM (engine args, accessed 2026-07):
--gpu-memory-utilization(default ~0.92) — fraction of each GPU vLLM may claim. Weights are loaded, then the rest of this budget becomes the KV-cache pool. Raising it toward 1.0 buys more concurrent sequences but risks OOM from activation/CUDA-graph spikes; lower it if you get OOM at load or under burst.--max-model-len— max context (prompt + output) per request; auto-derived from the model config if unset. This is the single biggest OOM lever: KV cache scales withmax-model-len × concurrent sequences. A model whose weights fit will still OOM if you leave the full 128K context on and let many long requests batch. Cap--max-model-lento what you actually need.
The mental model: KV_pool = gpu_memory_utilization × VRAM − weights, and
concurrent_sequences ≈ KV_pool ÷ (bytes_per_token × context_len). Too-long context or too-high
utilization eats the pool. --max-num-seqs and --max-num-batched-tokens cap the batch to trade
latency vs throughput. Full KV math + an OOM playbook: references/memory-and-throughput.md.
Self-host health check (no credential needed)
/health requires no API key, so it is the safe first probe on any endpoint you did not just start:
export VLLM_BASE_URL=http://localhost:8000
curl -fsS "$VLLM_BASE_URL/health" && echo " up" # 200, empty body when ready
curl -fsS "$VLLM_BASE_URL/v1/models" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer ${VLLM_API_KEY:-sk-local}" # confirms WHICH model/adapters are served
/health says "the server is alive"; /v1/models says "and it is serving the model you expect" (plus
any LoRA adapters). If --api-key is set, /v1/models needs the bearer header but /health never
does. During load a slow first /health is normal — big models take a while to page in.
Honest alternatives — when to prefer another engine
- Text Generation Inference (TGI) — Hugging Face's server; reach for it if you are all-in on the HF ecosystem/tooling and want their supported stack.
- SGLang — competitive throughput with strong RadixAttention prefix-cache reuse; prefer it for heavy shared-prefix workloads (agents, long system prompts, structured generation).
- TensorRT-LLM — squeezes maximum latency/throughput on NVIDIA GPUs via compiled engines, at the cost of a heavier build/ahead-of-time compile step; prefer it when you must wring out every last ms on NVIDIA hardware and can pay the ops complexity.
- Ollama / llama.cpp — single-box / laptop / CPU-or-Metal, one or few users, GGUF quants,
zero-ceremony. Prefer it when there is no concurrency to exploit — that is the
ollamaskill.
Guardrails
- Cap
--max-model-len. Leaving the full context window on is the top OOM cause; KV cache scales with context × concurrency (engine args). - Tune
--gpu-memory-utilizationfor OOM, not throughput first. Lower it if OOM at load/burst; raise it (carefully) for more concurrency. It is a fraction of one GPU's memory. - A model that fits one GPU should stay on one GPU. Tensor parallelism adds sync overhead — use it to fit, not to speed up an already-fitting model.
- Quant is a VRAM win, not free speed, and its quality cost is real — verify throughput at your concurrency and quality on your task (quantization).
- Never expose an unauthenticated server. No
--api-key= open endpoint on0.0.0.0:8000. --max-lora-rankmust be ≥ the adapter's trained rank, and base + adapter must match, or the LoRA fails to load.- This is not a laptop tool. No GPU / one user →
ollama. The GPU box + autoscaling →runpod/modal.
Related skills
open-weights— choose the model/size/license/quant to serve. vLLM runs it; it does not pick it.finetuning(and single-GPUunsloth) — produce the LoRA adapter or merged weights that--enable-lora/vllm servethen hosts. They train; vLLM serves.runpod— rent/provision the GPU box vLLM runs on (bring-your-own-container GPU rental).modal— serverless GPU containers + autoscaling around a vLLM process. The box and scaling, vs vLLM the engine.ollama— the single-user / laptop counterpart. No concurrency to exploit → use it, not vLLM.- Hosted inference you do not operate →
together-fireworks/huggingface(you call an API; here you run the server).
Checklist
- Chose vLLM because there is concurrency to exploit (else
ollama/ a hosted API). -
vllm serve <model>up;/healthreturns 200 and/v1/modelsshows the expected model. -
--api-key(orVLLM_API_KEY) set if the endpoint is reachable beyond localhost. - Parallelism only if the model does not fit one GPU: TP = GPUs/node, PP = nodes.
-
--max-model-lencapped to real need;--gpu-memory-utilizationset with OOM headroom. - Quant chosen for VRAM fit and benchmarked at real concurrency (not assumed faster).
- LoRA:
--max-lora-rank≥ trained rank; adapter reachable by name via themodelfield. - Client points at
base_url=<server>/v1;modelmatches a/v1/modelsid.
References
- references/flags-and-endpoints.md — the load-bearing
vllm serveflags, the full endpoint catalog with example requests, parallelism sizing, and the LoRA runtime API. - references/memory-and-throughput.md — KV-cache math, the OOM playbook, quantization tradeoffs at different batch sizes, and throughput-tuning knobs.