Skip to content

LLMs2 min read

AtomCite: Verification and Correction of Supplied Page-Level Citations in Multi-Page Documents

arXiv:2609.05802v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models answering questions over multi-page documents are expected to cite the supporting pages, yet supplied citations are sometimes inaccurate, and current evaluations score...

By OpenSmartRoute editorial · attributed excerpt

From arXiv cs.CL

arXiv:2609.05802v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models answering questions over multi-page documents are expected to cite the supporting pages, yet supplied citations are sometimes inaccurate, and current evaluations score citations at generation time or against text passages: no existing benchmark evaluates whether a system can verify and correct a page-level citation already attached to an answer. We propose AtomCite, an agentic framework that parses an answer into claims, checks each claim against the image of its cited page, and applies a deterministic repair policy. To evaluate it, we introduce DocCite, to our knowledge the first benchmark for systems that verify and correct page-level citations in document images. Built on MP-DocVQA and DUDE, it combines 928 validated injected instances with 2,468 candidate natural errors harvested from frontier- and efficiency-tier models, of which a two-annotator audit confirms 1,909 as genuine errors. Primary labels are assigned deterministically, not by LLM judges, with the human audit as a separate validation layer. Across three model families (Gemini, Claude, and GPT), AtomCite reaches around 93% binary verification accuracy on the injected benchmark, significantly outperforming every OCR-only condition, including a compute-matched control, and exceeding every prior text-based baseline given the same OCR text. Its repair policy lifts citation precision on the injected mix from a constructed 34% to 87-90% while retaining over 90% of correct claims. AtomCite also transfers: with frozen prompts and zero training, it raises the hallucination-detection scores of two open 7-8B models on five public benchmarks above the same models prompted as direct judges. Finally, the audit shows that noise in automatic labels biases measured verifier accuracy and can reverse system rankings, so evaluations relying only on synthetic or automatic labels risk mismeasuring verification capability.

Read the original at arXiv cs.CL: AtomCite: Verification and Correction of Supplied Page-Level Citations in Multi-Page Documents

Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.05802

Topics

Published Sep 9, 2026 · updated Sep 9, 2026 · 301 words

This post is an attributed excerpt of the source above (unusable model output); no model rewrote it. Refer to the source for the authoritative text.

Keep reading

Related posts

More in LLMs

LLMs1 min read

When Agent Governance Helps

arXiv:2609.05531v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: No specification says how a governed autotelic AI agent organization, where agents pursue self-generated goals inside guardrails, should be designed and evaluated. We answer in two parts. F...