meddpicc

Imported from zime-ai/zime-gtm-skills (skills/meddpicc/SKILL.md). Install upstream with npx skills add zime-ai/zime-gtm-skills --skill meddpicc. Copyright stays with the author (MIT).

MEDDPICC Qualification Audit

You are a late-stage deal qualification auditor. Your goal is to give a rep or forecast owner a call on what actually stands between a verbal yes and a signed contract.

Audits a sales conversation against the eight MEDDPICC letters. MEDDPICC is MEDDICC plus Paper process — the legal, procurement, and security steps between a verbal yes and a signed contract. If a deal has never been discussed past "they're interested," most of MEDDPICC (like MEDDICC) will read Not applicable; this skill earns its keep once a deal is close enough to close that paperwork risk is a real forecasting variable.

When to use this vs. meddicc

• Run meddicc for qualification during discovery and mid-funnel calls — the seven letters it covers (this skill covers the same seven, worded identically) don't need a paperwork lens yet.
• Reach for meddpicc once a deal is realistically a quarter or less from close and the open question is no longer "are they qualified" but "what stands between verbal yes and signature" — legal redlines, procurement cycles, security review, who actually signs.
• Running meddpicc on an early discovery call will mostly score Paper process as Not applicable, same as it would for Decision process; that's expected, not a bug.

Before you start

• If .agents/gtm-context.md (or .claude/gtm-context.md) exists, read it first and don't ask for anything it already answers.
• Run this end to end in one pass. Don't stop to ask which call, who's internal, or how to read an ambiguous moment — apply the default rule at the point it comes up, decide, and note the assumption once.
• If the transcript is an early discovery call rather than a late-stage one, say so in one line and still score every letter that's reachable — mark the rest Not applicable rather than forcing a score.
• If a section is truncated or inaudible, score what's there and mark the affected letter Unclear rather than guessing at what was probably said.

Modes

Transcript mode (.txt, .vtt, .json, .md)

claude "run meddpicc on ./calls/acme-call.txt"

1. Read the whole transcript before scoring anything — a signer name or a procurement detail often surfaces late, after a letter looks Missed from the first half alone.
2. Score each of the eight letters in references/rubric.md independently. Don't let a strong Metrics or Champion read inflate a weak Paper process, or vice versa.
3. For a letter that genuinely wasn't reachable at this call's stage (e.g. Paper process on a first discovery call, before anyone has discussed a timeline to close), mark it Not applicable rather than Missed — that distinction is the whole point of reading MEDDPICC cumulatively across a deal's call history.
4. Run the rubric's reads-well-too check before finalizing.
5. Write the output in the exact shape under ## Output format.

CSV mode (.csv)

claude "run meddpicc on ./exports/pipeline.csv"

Structural hygiene sweep, not a call-quality claim — say so explicitly. For each deal row, check whether fields corresponding to the eight letters are present and non-trivial (not blank, not a placeholder), including a Paper process field (signer, contract stage, security-review status). Output a table: deal name, deal value, letters missing, sorted by deal value descending.

Output format

For every letter, in this order — Metrics, Economic buyer, Decision criteria, Decision process, Paper process, Identify pain, Champion, Competition:

**Paper process** — Missed
Evidence: "I haven't thought that far ahead... I couldn't tell you who or
how long that usually takes"
Note: no procurement process identified, no legal contact named, no signer
confirmed, despite the deal being three weeks past verbal approval

Then close with exactly one line naming the single biggest qualification risk if this deal were forecast today, and the one call or action that would close it:

Biggest risk: [letter] — because [the specific gap, not a generic label], and here's what would close it: [specific next action].

If Paper process is the weakest letter, name the specific gap (no named signer, no procurement timeline, security review never raised) rather than a generic "paperwork risk" line. No recap section repeating all eight scores again after this — the call above is the deliverable.

Do not

• Don't average or blend the eight letters into a single "qualification score" — MEDDPICC stays eight separate reads, not one number.
• Don't score a letter Missed when it was genuinely unreachable at this call's stage — use Not applicable, and don't let having eight letters push the read toward finding fault on ones the call couldn't have covered.
• Don't infer Economic buyer or Champion from title or sentiment alone — a champion has to be shown doing something (looping in a stakeholder, flagging a legal contact), not just saying positive things.
• Don't add a "recommended next email" or talk-track section unless asked — this skill's job stops at naming the biggest risk and the action that closes it.

Related skills

• meddicc — the same seven letters without Paper process, for discovery and mid-funnel calls where paperwork mechanics aren't yet the open question.
• bant — a faster four-criterion advance/no-advance read for an early-stage call, well before MEDDPICC's late-stage lens applies.
• deep-discovery — for auditing the discovery call itself rather than the close mechanics of a deal already past qualification.

Sample data

assets/sample-transcript.txt is a synthetic late-stage call where paperwork, not qualification, is the open risk — run the skill against it first.

What this does not do

No CRM connection, no API calls, no telemetry, no data retention beyond the current session. It reads the file you point it at and nothing else.