Name: ork-review-pr
Author: yonatangross

Imported from yonatangross/orchestkit (plugins/ork-codex/skills/ork-review-pr/SKILL.md). Install upstream with npx skills add yonatangross/orchestkit --skill ork-review-pr. Copyright stays with the author.

Ork Review PR

Stay read-only and review the actual diff in its repository context. Read the applicable instructions, trace changed behavior to its callers and tests, and prioritize correctness, security, data loss, race conditions, backwards compatibility, and evidence gaps over style.

Verify third-party API and configuration claims against the context7 MCP server (resolve-library-id, then query-docs) before reporting or dismissing a finding that turns on library behavior. A wrong recalled signature is how a review invents a bug and how it misses one.

Use one reviewer for a focused diff. For a broad or high-risk PR, fan out independent read-only passes for code-path mapping, risk review, and documentation/API verification; each must return file and line evidence. Prefer ork_reviewer when installed, otherwise use a fresh built-in explorer/reviewer role.

Lead with findings ordered by severity. Every finding needs a concrete location, impact, and a reproduction or reasoning path. If there are no findings, say what was checked and what was not. Do not modify files or approve/merge the PR.

# after Install: the listing is in your workspace's routing pool - a plan picks it for its slot curl -s -X POST https://api.opensmartroute.ai/api/v1/route -H 'Authorization: Bearer $OSR_API_KEY' -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d '{"text": "...", "plan": true}'

Install ork-review-pr and it becomes one more candidate the router can pick - when it fits.

A listing is a routing target with a manifest: what it does, which domains it covers, what it costs and who publishes it. Once installed it sits beside your own models and tools, is scored like any other candidate for each request, and shows up in the trace when it wins. Ratings come from workspaces that installed it, one per account.

{ "ocm": "1", "id": "yonatangross-orchestkit-ork-review-pr", "kind": "skill", "name": "ork-review-pr", "description": "Review a pull request or branch for correctness, regressions, security, operational risk, and missing evidence. Use when a request asks to review a PR, review a diff, find real bugs, assess merge risk, or provide evidence-backed review findings. Do not use for implementation or style-only cleanup.", "publisher": "yonatangross", "version": "1.0.0", "capabilities": { "domains": [ "coding" ], "tags": [ "skill-md", "skills-sh" ], "languages": [ "en" ] }, "quality_prior": 0.6, "examples": [ "Review a pull request or branch for correctness, regressions, security, operational risk, and missing evidence. Use when a request asks to review a PR, review a diff, find real bugs, assess merge risk, or provide evidence-backed review findings. Do not use for implementation or style-only cleanup." ], "primary": false, "metadata": { "source": { "provider": "skills.sh", "repository": "https://github.com/yonatangross/orchestkit", "path": "plugins/ork-codex/skills/ork-review-pr/SKILL.md", "ref": "HEAD", "url": "https://github.com/yonatangross/orchestkit/blob/HEAD/plugins/ork-codex/skills/ork-review-pr/SKILL.md", "key": "yonatangross/orchestkit/plugins/ork-codex/skills/ork-review-pr/SKILL.md" } }, "instructions": "# Ork Review PR\n\nStay read-only and review the actual diff in its repository context. Read the applicable instructions, trace changed behavior to its callers and tests, and prioritize correctness, security, data loss, race conditions, backwards compatibility, and evidence gaps over style.\n\nVerify third-party API and configuration claims against the context7 MCP server (`resolve-library-id`, then `query-docs`) before reporting or dismissing a finding that turns on library behavior. A wrong recalled signature is how a review invents a bug and how it misses one.\n\nUse one reviewer for a focused di", "cost": { "context_tokens": 278 } }

ork-review-pr

About

Ork Review PR

Use it

Install ork-review-pr and it becomes one more candidate the router can pick - when it fits.

Manifest

Reviews