Name: pr-review
Author: xSoVx

Prompt file imported from xSoVx/dc-adapter-rmc (.claude/commands/pr-review.md). Fill in {{arguments}} before use. Copyright stays with the author.

PR Review

PR Link/Number: {{arguments}}

Instructions: Execute each task in the order given to conduct a thorough code review. Update GitHub with this review. Important: The future is now—any improvements or "future" recommendations must be addressed immediately.

Task 1: Product Manager Review

Objective: Assess from a product management perspective, focusing on:

Business Value: Does this PR clearly advance our core product goals and deliver immediate ROI?
User Experience: Is the change intuitive and delightful for users right now? If not, make fixes immediately.
Strategic Alignment: Does the PR align with current (and long-term, i.e., now) strategic objectives?

Action: Provide clear directives on how to ensure maximum user and business impact. All "future" suggestions must be implemented now.

Task 2: Developer Review

Objective: Evaluate the code thoroughly from a senior lead engineer perspective:

Code Quality & Maintainability: Is the code structured for readability and easy maintenance? If not, refactor now.
Performance & Scalability: Will these changes operate efficiently at scale? If not, optimize immediately.
Best Practices & Standards: Note any deviation from coding standards and correct it now.

Action: Leave a concise yet complete review comment, ensuring all improvements happen immediately—no deferrals.

Task 3: Quality Engineer Review

Objective: Verify the overall quality, testing strategy, and reliability of the solution:

Test Coverage: Are there sufficient tests (unit, integration, E2E)? If not, add them now.
Potential Bugs & Edge Cases: Have all edge cases been considered? If not, address them immediately.
Regression Risk: Confirm changes don't undermine existing functionality. If risk is identified, mitigate now with additional checks or tests.

Action: Provide a detailed QA assessment, insisting any "future" improvements be completed right away.

Task 4: Security Engineer Review

Objective: Ensure robust security practices and compliance:

Vulnerabilities:

Install pr-review and it becomes one more candidate the router can pick - when it fits.

A listing is a routing target with a manifest: what it does, which domains it covers, what it costs and who publishes it. Once installed it sits beside your own models and tools, is scored like any other candidate for each request, and shows up in the trace when it wins. Ratings come from workspaces that installed it, one per account.

# PR Review **PR Link/Number**: {{arguments}} > **Instructions**: Execute each task in the order given to conduct a thorough code review. Update GitHub with this review. > **Important**: The future is now—any improvements or "future" recommendations must be addressed **immediately**. --- ## Task 1: Product Manager Review **Objective**: Assess from a product management perspective, focusing on: - **Business Value**: Does this PR clearly advance our core product goals and deliver immediate ROI? - **User Experience**: Is the change intuitive and delightful for users right now? If not, make fixes immediately. - **Strategic Alignment**: Does the PR align with current (and long-term, i.e., now) strategic objectives? **Action**: Provide clear directives on how to ensure maximum user and business impact. All "future" suggestions must be implemented now. --- ## Task 2: Developer Review **Objective**: Evaluate the code thoroughly from a senior lead engineer perspective: 1. **Code Quality & Maintainability**: Is the code structured for readability and easy maintenance? If not, refactor now. 2. **Performance & Scalability**: Will these changes operate efficiently at scale? If not, optimize immediately. 3. **Best Practices & Standards**: Note any deviation from coding standards and correct it now. **Action**: Leave a concise yet complete review comment, ensuring all improvements happen immediately—no deferrals. --- ## Task 3: Quality Engineer Review **Objective**: Verify the overall quality, testing strategy, and reliability of the solution: 1. **Test Coverage**: Are there sufficient tests (unit, integration, E2E)? If not, add them now. 2. **Potential Bugs & Edge Cases**: Have all edge cases been considered? If not, address them immediately. 3. **Regression Risk**: Confirm changes don't undermine existing functionality. If risk is identified, mitigate now with additional checks or tests. **Action**: Provide a detailed QA assessment, insisting any "future" improvements be completed right away. --- ## Task 4: Security Engineer Review **Objective**: Ensure robust security practices and compliance: 1. **Vulnerabilities**:

{ "prompt": "# PR Review\n\n**PR Link/Number**: {{arguments}}\n\n> **Instructions**: Execute each task in the order given to conduct a thorough code review. Update GitHub with this review.\n> **Important**: The future is now—any improvements or \"future\" recommendations must be addressed **immediately**.\n\n---\n\n## Task 1: Product Manager Review\n\n**Objective**: Assess from a product management perspective, focusing on:\n- **Business Value**: Does this PR clearly advance our core product goals and deliver immediate ROI?\n- **User Experience**: Is the change intuitive and delightful for users right now? If not, make fixes immediately.\n- **Strategic Alignment**: Does the PR align with current (and long-term, i.e., now) strategic objectives?\n\n**Action**: Provide clear directives on how to ensure maximum user and business impact. All \"future\" suggestions must be implemented now.\n\n---\n\n## Task 2: Developer Review\n\n**Objective**: Evaluate the code thoroughly from a senior lead engineer perspective:\n1. **Code Quality & Maintainability**: Is the code structured for readability and easy maintenance? If not, refactor now.\n2. **Performance & Scalability**: Will these changes operate efficiently at scale? If not, optimize immediately.\n3. **Best Practices & Standards**: Note any deviation from coding standards and correct it now.\n\n**Action**: Leave a concise yet complete review comment, ensuring all improvements happen immediately—no deferrals.\n\n---\n\n## Task 3: Quality Engineer Review\n\n**Objective**: Verify the overall quality, testing strategy, and reliability of the solution:\n1. **Test Coverage**: Are there sufficient tests (unit, integration, E2E)? If not, add them now.\n2. **Potential Bugs & Edge Cases**: Have all edge cases been considered? If not, address them immediately.\n3. **Regression Risk**: Confirm changes don't undermine existing functionality. If risk is identified, mitigate now with additional checks or tests.\n\n**Action**: Provide a detailed QA assessment, insisting any \"future\" improvements be completed right away.\n\n---\n\n## Task 4: Security Engineer Review\n\n**Objective**: Ensure robust security practices and compliance:\n1. **Vulnerabilities**:", "variables": [ "arguments" ], "notes": "Conduct comprehensive PR review from multiple perspectives (PM, Developer, QA, Security) Tools: Bash(gh *), Read. Arguments: <pr_link_or_number>.", "metadata": { "source": { "provider": "github-claude-commands", "repository": "https://github.com/xSoVx/dc-adapter-rmc", "path": ".claude/commands/pr-review.md", "ref": "7c71eefa120f0298a6b5c349cce2a0d92df8575b", "url": "https://github.com/xSoVx/dc-adapter-rmc/blob/7c71eefa120f0298a6b5c349cce2a0d92df8575b/.claude/commands/pr-review.md", "key": "xSoVx/dc-adapter-rmc/.claude/commands/pr-review.md" } } }

pr-review

About

PR Review

Task 1: Product Manager Review

Task 2: Developer Review

Task 3: Quality Engineer Review

Task 4: Security Engineer Review

Install pr-review and it becomes one more candidate the router can pick - when it fits.

Use it

Manifest

Reviews