Prompt file imported from VortexyAether/cfd-ai-paper-skills (.codex/prompts/full-paper-reviewer-editor.md). Copyright stays with the author.

Codex native multi-agent full-paper prompt

Name: full-paper-reviewer-editor
Author: VortexyAether

Use this for a longer manuscript section or full draft. Paste into one Codex CLI session from the package root.

Use native Codex subagents for a CFD-AI/SciML manuscript workflow and run a bounded edit-review loop.

Source-scope rules:
- Use only the manuscript text and files I explicitly provide.
- Separate supplied evidence from inferred risks.
- Do not invent solver, mesh, timestep, metric, citation, runtime, code, or dataset details.
- Mark missing facts as TODO.

Parallel pass:
- Spawn `cfd_reviewer`: Fatal/Major reviewer risks only.
- Spawn `evidence_auditor`: claim-evidence map and TODOs.
- Spawn `experiment_planner`: minimum validation/baseline/diagnostic/ablation plan.
- Spawn `figure_table_editor`: figures/tables needed to make claims inspectable.
- Wait for all agents.

Integration pass:
- Merge outputs into one blocker ledger.
- Prioritize Fatal blockers, then Major blockers, then wording fixes.
- Resolve contradictions between agents explicitly.

Bounded edit-review loop:
- Maximum cycles: 3.
- Cycle 1: send the merged ledger to `prose_editor`; ask it to rewrite only the requested section, preserving evidence boundaries.
- Review 1: send original text + merged ledger + revised text to `gatekeeper`; ask for residual blockers, new overclaims, and continue/stop decision.
- If gatekeeper says continue, send residual-risk table + current revision back to `prose_editor` for Cycle 2.
- Run `gatekeeper` after every edit.
- Stop early when no Fatal/Major blockers remain and no new overclaim is introduced.
- Stop early when remaining blockers require new experiments/data/figures/tables rather than prose.

Return:
1. source-scope contract;
2. per-agent summaries;
3. merged blocker ledger;
4. edit-review cycle log;
5. final revised section;
6. gatekeeper residual-risk table;
7. stop reason;
8. prioritized next experiments/tables/figures.

Manuscript / section:

<PASTE TEXT HERE>

# Codex native multi-agent full-paper prompt Use this for a longer manuscript section or full draft. Paste into one Codex CLI session from the package root. ```text Use native Codex subagents for a CFD-AI/SciML manuscript workflow and run a bounded edit-review loop. Source-scope rules: - Use only the manuscript text and files I explicitly provide. - Separate supplied evidence from inferred risks. - Do not invent solver, mesh, timestep, metric, citation, runtime, code, or dataset details. - Mark missing facts as TODO. Parallel pass: - Spawn `cfd_reviewer`: Fatal/Major reviewer risks only. - Spawn `evidence_auditor`: claim-evidence map and TODOs. - Spawn `experiment_planner`: minimum validation/baseline/diagnostic/ablation plan. - Spawn `figure_table_editor`: figures/tables needed to make claims inspectable. - Wait for all agents. Integration pass: - Merge outputs into one blocker ledger. - Prioritize Fatal blockers, then Major blockers, then wording fixes. - Resolve contradictions between agents explicitly. Bounded edit-review loop: - Maximum cycles: 3. - Cycle 1: send the merged ledger to `prose_editor`; ask it to rewrite only the requested section, preserving evidence boundaries. - Review 1: send original text + merged ledger + revised text to `gatekeeper`; ask for residual blockers, new overclaims, and continue/stop decision. - If gatekeeper says continue, send residual-risk table + current revision back to `prose_editor` for Cycle 2. - Run `gatekeeper` after every edit. - Stop early when no Fatal/Major blockers remain and no new overclaim is introduced. - Stop early when remaining blockers require new experiments/data/figures/tables rather than prose. Return: 1. source-scope contract; 2. per-agent summaries; 3. merged blocker ledger; 4. edit-review cycle log; 5. final revised section; 6. gatekeeper residual-risk table; 7. stop reason; 8. prioritized next experiments/tables/figures. Manuscript / section: <PASTE TEXT HERE> ```

{ "prompt": "# Codex native multi-agent full-paper prompt\n\nUse this for a longer manuscript section or full draft. Paste into one Codex CLI session from the package root.\n\n```text\nUse native Codex subagents for a CFD-AI/SciML manuscript workflow and run a bounded edit-review loop.\n\nSource-scope rules:\n- Use only the manuscript text and files I explicitly provide.\n- Separate supplied evidence from inferred risks.\n- Do not invent solver, mesh, timestep, metric, citation, runtime, code, or dataset details.\n- Mark missing facts as TODO.\n\nParallel pass:\n- Spawn `cfd_reviewer`: Fatal/Major reviewer risks only.\n- Spawn `evidence_auditor`: claim-evidence map and TODOs.\n- Spawn `experiment_planner`: minimum validation/baseline/diagnostic/ablation plan.\n- Spawn `figure_table_editor`: figures/tables needed to make claims inspectable.\n- Wait for all agents.\n\nIntegration pass:\n- Merge outputs into one blocker ledger.\n- Prioritize Fatal blockers, then Major blockers, then wording fixes.\n- Resolve contradictions between agents explicitly.\n\nBounded edit-review loop:\n- Maximum cycles: 3.\n- Cycle 1: send the merged ledger to `prose_editor`; ask it to rewrite only the requested section, preserving evidence boundaries.\n- Review 1: send original text + merged ledger + revised text to `gatekeeper`; ask for residual blockers, new overclaims, and continue/stop decision.\n- If gatekeeper says continue, send residual-risk table + current revision back to `prose_editor` for Cycle 2.\n- Run `gatekeeper` after every edit.\n- Stop early when no Fatal/Major blockers remain and no new overclaim is introduced.\n- Stop early when remaining blockers require new experiments/data/figures/tables rather than prose.\n\nReturn:\n1. source-scope contract;\n2. per-agent summaries;\n3. merged blocker ledger;\n4. edit-review cycle log;\n5. final revised section;\n6. gatekeeper residual-risk table;\n7. stop reason;\n8. prioritized next experiments/tables/figures.\n\nManuscript / section:\n\n<PASTE TEXT HERE>\n```", "variables": [], "notes": "Use this for a longer manuscript section or full draft. Paste into one Codex CLI session from the package root.", "metadata": { "source": { "provider": "github-codex-prompts", "repository": "https://github.com/VortexyAether/cfd-ai-paper-skills", "path": ".codex/prompts/full-paper-reviewer-editor.md", "ref": "544775393882aa0f8769e5f7a79d8e58376331ae", "url": "https://github.com/VortexyAether/cfd-ai-paper-skills/blob/544775393882aa0f8769e5f7a79d8e58376331ae/.codex/prompts/full-paper-reviewer-editor.md", "key": "VortexyAether/cfd-ai-paper-skills/.codex/prompts/full-paper-reviewer-editor.md" } } }

full-paper-reviewer-editor

About

Codex native multi-agent full-paper prompt

Use it

Manifest

Reviews