Prompt file imported from TNC-IT-TEAM/TNC.Infrastructure.LandingZone (
.github/prompts/review-research-document.prompt.md). Fill in{{selection}},{{documentPath}}before use. Copyright stays with the author.
Review this research document: {{selection}}
If no document is selected, review: {{documentPath}}
Only review Markdown research documents stored under docs/research/. If the supplied path is outside that folder or does not end in .md, report the invalid location and stop without editing or reviewing it.
Assess the document against the research-authoring skill, its template, and the source evaluation guidance. Check repository context, source authority and dates, traceability of material claims, separation of facts and inferences, alternatives and trade-offs, uncertainty, stale claims, link validity, and editorial clarity.
Return findings first, ordered by impact:
- Unsupported or misleading claims
- Source-quality or traceability problems
- Stale or time-sensitive information
- Omitted alternatives, trade-offs, or limitations
- Editorial clarity issues
For each finding, include the affected section, evidence, impact, and precise remediation. Then provide a short summary of strengths, open questions, and remaining validation gaps. Do not edit the document.