Imported from TerminallyLazy/RadSysX (
docs/AGENTS.md). Install upstream withnpx skills add TerminallyLazy/RadSysX --skill docs. Copyright stays with the author.
Design Documents DOX
Last updated: 2026-09-23
Purpose and ownership
- Own written design specifications and implementation plans under
docs/, including the architectural brainstorming artifacts insuperpowers/specs/and subsequent plans insuperpowers/plans/when created. - Research surveys and exploratory alternatives remain in
roadmap/; link to them rather than duplicating their source research. - Runtime code, tests, dependencies and operational instructions remain owned by their existing subtrees.
Contracts
- Distinguish approval of conversational design sections, approval of the consolidated written specification, approval of an implementation plan, implementation and observed validation.
- A specification describes intended behavior. It must not imply that code, an evaluation dataset, live-provider acceptance or clinical validation already exists.
- Preserve the approved intent, product-surface boundaries, data handling, failure behavior and acceptance criteria. Record the current review stage in each artifact.
- Keep source snapshots dated and link external claims to their primary sources. Revalidate version-dependent details before implementation.
- Keep credentials, patient information, generated evaluation artifacts and private runtime data out of design documents and Git.
- Read the root DOX and the relevant runtime child DOX before turning a design into code. Update the owning runtime guidance with implementation, not merely because a design proposes it.
Current specifications
superpowers/specs/2026-09-23-codex-study-exploration-design.md: whole-view/series observations and voice-independent Codex use of native viewer tools. Written design approved by the user on 2026-09-23; implemented on the study-exploration branch, with release and acceptance tracked in the study exploration runbook. Includes scope grants, tool parity, full versus partial frame coverage, action receipts, takeover and native/subscription acceptance.superpowers/plans/2026-09-23-codex-study-exploration.md: implementation plan for the approved study-exploration design. Written plan approved by the user on 2026-09-23 for native execution; implementation is in progress. Distinguish implementation, synthetic native acceptance, real subscription acceptance and activation in the user's desktop.superpowers/specs/2026-09-22-jev-pubmed-evidence-review-design.md: public/synthetic PubMed evidence evaluation using a separate runner, immutable inputs, Jev assessments, blind review and comparative results. The user approved the written specification on 2026-09-22.superpowers/plans/2026-09-22-jev-pubmed-evidence-review.md: implementation tasks and verification for that specification. The user approved native execution on 2026-09-22. Implementation is in progress oncodex/jev-evidence-implementation; provider and human-quality acceptance remain separate.superpowers/specs/2026-09-22-jev-sidebar-evidence-review-design.md: explicit public PubMed review in the app, owned jobs and visible receipts. The user approved this written specification on 2026-09-22. The separate offline evaluator remains supported.superpowers/plans/2026-09-22-jev-sidebar-evidence-review.md: implementation plan approved by the user for Native execution on 2026-09-22. Implementation and acceptance evidence are recorded inroadmap/ai-backend/JEV_SIDEBAR_IMPLEMENTATION.md; human-quality validation remains separate.
Verification
- Review specifications for inconsistent requirements, ambiguous outcomes, unbounded side effects and unresolved placeholders.
- Check local links and run
git diff --checkfor documentation-only changes. Runtime tests are only required when executable behavior changes.
Child DOX Index
- None.