About

Imported from shipshitdev/skills (skills/weekly-review/SKILL.md). Install upstream with npx skills add shipshitdev/skills --skill weekly-review. Copyright stays with the author.

Weekly Review

Name: weekly-review
Author: shipshitdev

Turn a review period into an evidence-backed maintenance report and, when requested, verified repairs. Reuse the review and cleanup engines. Keep provider procedures and review rubrics in their owning skills.

Contract

Inputs:

Repository or monorepo, board URL/provider, and optional package scope
A window such as 7d (default), explicit dates with timezone, or since <SHA>
Optional previous review checkpoint and explicitly authorized repair scope
Report-only by default; --fix authorizes code repairs for confirmed findings within the reviewed scope; --report-only overrides earlier repair authority

Outputs:

One report of shipped, broken, drifted, blocked, repaired, and next priorities
Evidence and coverage per repository, issue, package, and operational check
Reviewed commit endpoints and a proposed next checkpoint, with unfinished work

Creates/Modifies:

Nothing in report-only mode; return the report and checkpoint in the response
In repair mode: scoped source/test edits and verification artifacts; publish repair PRs according to the repository's existing delivery policy

External Side Effects:

Reads repository, board, CI, deployment, and available monitoring evidence
Board edits, issue filing/closure, comments, merges, deployments, installations, and scheduling require their own explicit scope; --fix grants none of these

Confirmation Required:

Only for missing or expanded authority; preserve existing explicit approval for the same target/actions and forward restrictions to every delegate
Review requests and findings are not permission to modify production

Delegates To:

board-sync for board reconciliation and approved supported field corrections
full-code-review for retrospective review using the frozen diff and commit log
code-review for correctness and implementation-versus-acceptance checks
deslop for scoped dry-run findings or authorized cleanup
dependency-audit for dependency checks in audit mode when evidence needs refresh
test-runner for focused verification of authorized repairs

Resolve each engine through the active catalog and resources relative to its installed directory. Use Shipshit deslop; an upstream pstack:deslop plugin is a separate implementation, not an alias. Report missing engines instead of silently substituting a similarly named skill or installing dependencies.

Freeze the review scope

Resolve the default branch and pin its fetched tip as END. Review all authors, including automation accounts. Use the requested branch only when explicitly selected. Resolve an explicit checkpoint as BASE and verify it is an ancestor of END. Report rewritten or unavailable history instead of silently resetting it.

For a date window, record absolute start/end and timezone. Identify changes integrated into the target branch during that interval, including older authored commits merged during the week. Use integration/merge evidence rather than author dates alone. Include root-commit content when the window spans repository creation. Record the commit inventory and endpoints; disclose shallow or missing history. Inspect individual commit/PR diffs as needed because an aggregate diff can hide changes later reverted.

Keep uncommitted work and open PRs separate from integrated history. In a monorepo, list affected applications, shared packages, and downstream consumers. Apply a package filter without dropping cross-package contracts or claiming whole-repo coverage. Record any limits before drawing conclusions.

Audit work and implementation

Run the board-sync skill in report mode for the selected board and scope. Preserve its status semantics and incomplete-coverage findings. Audit every current in-scope issue, including backlog and deferred work; report archived history coverage separately. Inventory issues missing from the board as well as cards missing repository linkage.

For each issue, compare the stated problem and acceptance criteria with current code, relevant tests, linked PRs, and deployment evidence where shipment matters. Run the code-review skill for a targeted diff/spec comparison when useful. Distinguish implemented, partial, still valid, superseded/duplicate, and unclear. Keep stale issue wording separate from a real code defect. Absence of a patch or a closed issue does not establish implementation or deployment.

Return an issue coverage table with evidence and proposed disposition. Mark uninspected issues explicitly; a sample cannot support an all-issues verdict. Recommend closure or reprioritization only when evidence supports it.

Review the period

Run the code-review skill over the frozen changes for correctness and spec fidelity before the broader retrospective. Run the full-code-review skill with the frozen BASE-to-END diff, changed files, and COMMIT_LOG. Request its retrospective backlog and cross-commit lens. Preserve the complete commit inventory, including changes absent from the final diff. Report per-commit coverage and any omitted hunks or packages.

Combine new findings with the issue audit. Check existing issues and open PRs before proposing another repair. Trace findings to files, commits, and affected behavior. Keep a missing spec visible instead of inventing requirements.

Read existing CI, security/dependency alerts, deployment, and monitoring reports for the same scope. Check recurring errors, failed jobs, flaky checks, rollbacks, and integrated changes awaiting deployment. Run dependency-audit in audit mode only when relevant evidence is stale or absent and execution is available on an allowed host. Report each unavailable source as unavailable, not healthy. Reserve a full security or architecture audit for evidence that warrants it.

Repair and deslop

Run the deslop skill in dry-run mode over the explicitly frozen changed files and hunks. Pass that scope directly; its default branch-diff calculation may be empty after changes have merged. Review-only runs stop at findings.

With repair authority, address confirmed defects before cleanup. Retain existing behavior during deslop; preserve meaningful checks, technical language, and product intent. Apply findings to current code in an isolated scoped branch, rechecking evidence when the branch has advanced. A weekly request does not authorize a whole-tree rewrite.

Run the test-runner skill for affected verification, preserving host restrictions and the authorized repair scope. Satisfy repository-required local checks and review gates before publication. If the allowed verification host is unavailable, keep the repair unverified; do not substitute CI for required local checks. Follow the repository's policy for any draft PR. Use fresh CI and required review for a separately authorized merge. Report completed actions separately from planned actions. Failed checks remain unresolved findings.

Re-read affected board evidence after repairs. Apply only separately authorized, provider-supported corrections through board-sync. Issue closure and Jira transitions remain distinct actions. Do not normalize board configuration merely to make the audit pass.

Close the review

Deliver one concise report with evidence links:

Scope and coverage: repository/board, window, BASE/END, commit and issue counts, packages, sources, and completed/unavailable/uninspected checks
Shipped: verified delivery; list merged-but-not-deployed work separately
Broken, drifted, blocked: prioritized findings with existing issue/PR links, impact, evidence, and the proposed next action
Repaired: exact changes, verification, PRs, and remaining delivery gates
Next priorities: the three highest-value actions, or fewer when justified
Checkpoint: END only for completely reviewed code scope; retain the previous checkpoint and exact remaining scope when review is partial. Required cross-package contract and consumer checks are part of that scope; an uninspected required consumer prevents advancing the affected checkpoint. Track unresolved findings and incomplete board/operational checks separately for the next run.

An empty commit window still permits board and operational review. State no code changes rather than manufacturing cleanup. Finish report-only runs with the report. In repair mode, finish the authorized repair/delivery scope or identify the concrete remaining blocker. A recurring workflow does not itself schedule an automation.

Use it

Copy one of these into your project. Installing also returns the manifest and these snippets.

yaml

targets:
  - https://api.opensmartroute.ai/api/v1/registry/shipshitdev-skills-weekly-review/manifest   # or paste the manifest below

Manifest

An Open Capability Manifest: the router reads it to know what this does, what it costs and when to pick it.

shipshitdev-skills-weekly-review.ocm.jsonjson

{
  "ocm": "1",
  "id": "shipshitdev-skills-weekly-review",
  "kind": "skill",
  "name": "weekly-review",
  "description": "Coordinates a weekly engineering review of board accuracy, recent code changes, operational health, and scoped cleanup. Use for a recurring repository health review or a review of the last several days.",
  "publisher": "shipshitdev",
  "version": "1.0.0",
  "capabilities": {
    "domains": [
      "coding"
    ],
    "tags": [
      "skill-md",
      "review",
      "weekly",
      "maintenance",
      "boards",
      "retrospective",
      "skills-sh"
    ],
    "languages": [
      "en"
    ]
  },
  "quality_prior": 0.6,
  "examples": [
    "Coordinates a weekly engineering review of board accuracy, recent code changes, operational health, and scoped cleanup. Use for a recurring repository health review or a review of the last several days."
  ],
  "primary": false,
  "metadata": {
    "source": {
      "provider": "skills.sh",
      "repository": "https://github.com/shipshitdev/skills",
      "path": "skills/weekly-review/SKILL.md",
      "ref": "HEAD",
      "url": "https://github.com/shipshitdev/skills/blob/HEAD/skills/weekly-review/SKILL.md",
      "key": "shipshitdev/skills/skills/weekly-review/SKILL.md"
    },
    "compatibility": "Requires repository history and access to the selected board; operational checks depend on existing service connections."
  },
  "instructions": "# Weekly Review\n\nTurn a review period into an evidence-backed maintenance report and, when\nrequested, verified repairs. Reuse the review and cleanup engines. Keep provider\nprocedures and review rubrics in their owning skills.\n\n## Contract\n\nInputs:\n\n- Repository or monorepo, board URL/provider, and optional package scope\n- A window such as `7d` (default), explicit dates with timezone, or `since <SHA>`\n- Optional previous review checkpoint and explicitly authorized repair scope\n- Report-only by default; `--fix` authorizes code repairs for confirmed findings\n  within the reviewed scope; `--report",
  "cost": {
    "context_tokens": 2130
  }
}

Fetch it by URL: GET /api/v1/registry/shipshitdev-skills-weekly-review/manifest?version=1.0.0

Reviews

Star ratings from people who tried it. One review per account; edit yours any time.

No reviews yet. Install it, try it, and be the first to rate it.