Imported from Seavenly/dotfiles (config/agents/skills/tuicr/SKILL.md). Install upstream with npx skills add Seavenly/dotfiles --skill tuicr. Copyright stays with the author.

tuicr Review Workflow

Use tuicr review as the default agent interface. The TUI is where the human reviews code; the CLI is how the agent discovers active sessions, reads user comments, and, only when appropriate, adds agent-authored comments.

Core Rule

First decide which workflow the user is asking for:

1. User-led review of agent-generated changes

   • The user wants to inspect the patch and write comments in tuicr.
   • Your job is to open or find the session, then retrieve the user's comments with tuicr review comments when they say comments are ready. If you are explicitly waiting while the user reviews, poll the same command periodically and look for new comment IDs.
   • Do not add your own review comments, do not preemptively review your own patch, and do not impersonate the user's comments.

2. Agent review of an AI-generated patch

   • The user wants you to understand, critique, or summarize a patch.
   • You may inspect the patch and propose findings.
   • If you can confidently identify this workflow and the target session, add findings directly with tuicr review add and an explicit --username identifying the agent. Ask first when the workflow or session is ambiguous.

If the user's intent is ambiguous, ask which workflow they want.

Attach To A Session

1. Determine the repository directory from the user's request, current working directory, or recent file operations. Ask if it is ambiguous.

2. List persisted sessions:

   tuicr review list --repo /path/to/repo   # checkout + its repo's PR sessions
   tuicr review list --repo owner/repo      # all sessions for a forge repo
   tuicr review list --all                  # every session across all repos

   --repo is a selector: a checkout path also surfaces PR sessions for that checkout's origin repo, and a forge coordinate like owner/repo matches local and PR sessions by owner/repo. Each row carries a kind (local or pr) and a usable slug. Use --all when you don't know the repo.

3. Choose the session:

   • If the CLI clearly reports exactly one relevant active session with "active": true, attach to it.
   • If multiple sessions are active, or the correct session is not clear, ask the user which slug to use.
   • If the user provided a slug or session JSON path, use it directly.
   • For a PR review, pass the PR slug from the listing (e.g. gh:owner/repo/pr/N) to --session; it is self-contained and needs no --repo.
   • If there is no active session, start or wait for one as described below.
   • Until active-session discovery is formalized as a stable protocol, treat "active": true as a convenience signal. If slug resolution fails, ask the user for the slug or repo path used by the session.

The CLI works even if the agent is not running inside tmux or zellij, so do not require a multiplexer just to connect to an existing active session.

Start A Session

When the user needs an interactive tuicr pane and no active session exists:

If both $TMUX and $ZELLIJ are set, prefer the innermost multiplexer if that is clear; otherwise ask.

Wrapper paths are relative to this skill directory:

<skill-directory>/tuicr-wrapper.sh /path/to/repo
<skill-directory>/tuicr-wrapper-zellij.sh /path/to/repo

If your tool supports command timeouts, use a long timeout, such as 10 minutes, because the wrappers wait for the TUI to exit. Once the TUI creates its active session, use tuicr review list --repo /path/to/repo to capture the slug. If your environment cannot run another command while the wrapper is waiting, read the comments after the user exits tuicr.

Read User Comments

This is the main review loop for user-led review.

There is no push stream from tuicr to the agent. Read comments by running the CLI on demand. After the user says comments are ready, or after the TUI exits, run:

tuicr review comments --repo /path/to/repo --session <slug>

The command emits JSON. Each comment includes fields like:

• id
• location
• path
• start_line
• end_line
• side
• comment_type
• lifecycle_state
• content

Treat these comments as the user's review feedback:

• issue: blocking problem to fix first
• suggestion: consider implementing or explain why not
• note: answer or acknowledge
• praise: no action required

If you are waiting during an active review, poll this command about every 30 seconds and compare comment IDs with the previous result. Read immediately when the user says comments are ready. Stop polling once the user says the review is done or your tooling would block other work.

If the result is empty, ask whether the user saved comments in the intended session or whether another active session should be selected. If the review may have continued while you were working, rerun tuicr review comments before claiming completion.

Add Agent Comments

Only add comments when the workflow allows it and, for agent-authored review, after the user approves writing them into tuicr.

Defaults:

• Prefer line comments when a specific file and line are known.
• Use file comments for file-scoped feedback.
• Use review-level comments only for whole-review summaries.
• Use --type issue for problems by default.
• Use suggestion, note, or praise when that better matches the intent.
• Pass --username so agent comments are visually distinguishable.

Examples:

tuicr review add --repo /path/to/repo --session <slug> \
  --target-file src/main.rs \
  --line 42 \
  --side new \
  --type issue \
  --username "Codex" \
  "Handle the empty case here."

tuicr review add --repo /path/to/repo --session <slug> \
  --target-file src/main.rs \
  --type suggestion \
  --username "Codex" \
  "Consider splitting this file-level concern into a helper."

Omit --target-file for a review-level comment. Add --end-line for a range comment. Use --side old for removed lines and --side new for added or unchanged lines in the new file.

For structured input, use --input with literal JSON, @path/to/file.json, or - for stdin. Supported target types are review, file, line, and line_range.

Legacy Export Output

Older wrapper-driven flows may emit:

=== TUICR INSTRUCTIONS ===
...
=== END TUICR INSTRUCTIONS ===

If present, process those instructions. Otherwise prefer tuicr review comments; it is the primary source of review feedback. If the wrapper mentions clipboard export, ask the user to paste it only when the CLI comments are unavailable.

Multiplexer Tips

tmux:

• Switch panes: Ctrl-b then arrow keys
• Close tuicr: press q
• Resize panes: Ctrl-b then Ctrl-arrow
• Zoom pane: Ctrl-b then z

zellij:

• Switch panes: Alt + arrow keys
• Close tuicr: press q
• Resize panes: Ctrl-n, then arrow keys
• Toggle fullscreen: Alt-f
• Cycle stacked panes: Alt + [ / ]

Error Handling

When Not To Use

• The user only wants raw git diff output.
• The user explicitly asks for a non-tuicr review workflow.
• The task is remote PR review and no tuicr PR session is involved.