Imported from sancovp/doc-mirror (skills/doc-mirror-prompts/resources/prompts/skill2framework/blog-organ/blog-writing/SKILL.md). Install upstream with npx skills add sancovp/doc-mirror --skill blog-writing. Copyright stays with the author.

blog-writing — fill the Core once, derive everything

The 'fill once, render everywhere' doctrine executed: the agent fills TWO JSON models against the LIVE field contract; cave_unicorn.journey_suite renders blog-aida.md + pack.md (from_core socials) deterministically. The agent never hand-writes the rendered output — only the fills.

RELIABILITY

• score: 0.50 runs: 3 verified-good: 3-by-commander-checklist, 0-by-user-gate last-verified: 2026-07-11
• (score moves only on the USER GATE — run 3 passed the full commander checklist below and is AWAITING Isaac's read; bump on his pass.)
• log (USER GATE, newest — the real gate): 2026-07-10 Isaac REJECTED both runs' outputs against the format bar, verbatim: "neither of these look like JourneyBlog AIDA fractals -- i dont see the links from the framework and the journeycore isnt really present correctly, the stories are not ABOUT the literal fucking stuff that happened to me/us... it needs to be ARCHIVAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL -- LOOK AT WHAT FUCKING HAPPENED TO ME AND FUCKING DO YOU WANT TO DO THIS YOURSELF!? thats the whole idea." Three defects: framework links absent from the render; the core not correctly present; stories generic instead of ARCHIVAL. The ARCHIVAL LAW + links requirement are now in the prompt (below); renderer-level links section is a merge-time item. My own verified-good reads measured grounding, not HIS bar — the user gate outranks.
• check-level: FULL_E2E required on first runs (read blog-aida.md + pack.md yourself)
• log (newest first):
  • 2026-07-11 USER GATE (composed-run chapter pair) — REJECTED AT THE CONTENT ROOT, the deepest correction yet (Isaac: "its... awful"): the blogs were ABOUT the cave-unicorn MODULE (an SDK) sourced from module docs + the agent's work journal, narrated from the agent's POV of Isaac. THE LAW THAT CAME OUT OF IT: THE FRAMEWORK LAW + THE POV LAW (now above, before the archival law) — the subject is always the FRAMEWORK (agent-skill instructions in a SkillTome, four facts carried, grounded N), and the story is Isaac's + OUR journey as a system. Both live posts unpublished (aisaac 09dd81e); node status=rejected so the nightly cannot republish. No prompt run is scored for this — the defect was upstream of the fills (the SUBJECT handed to the pipeline was wrong).
  • 2026-07-11 RUN 5 (cave-unicorn story, scan-lane release run) — HALT-TOOL MISFIRE, NO ARTIFACT: the agent worked passes 0-2 perfectly (contract, all sources read, canonical core COPIED faithfully) then called WriteBlockReportTool as a STATUS note ("blocked_reason: None — all sources read, no blockers") right before writing journey_blog.json — the block tool HALTS by design, so the run died with zero fills. The module's fill-verification caught the ok-report-no-artifact (socials_pack_error on the node; nightly-retry semantics intact). HARDENED: explicit never-call-a-halt-tool-as-a-status-report law added to FORBIDDEN below. Gate mechanics were all correct (hold pre-wire, release post-wire, dispatch). fills (Isaac, verbatim: "you dont publish the section title the hook lmao... its supposed to be in heros journey marketing format!!!" and "its not links its literally supposed to be copy with CTAs... Link to funnel about that thing"). The template's mechanic slot names (The Hook / Take Action / Links) were leaking into published copy. FIXED at the suite render (journey_suite._render_marketing_blog): structure invisible, bolded attention leads, closing = the CTA cycle as flowing copy ending in ONE funnel link (funnel_url arg; interim fallback deep_dive then plugin until funnel pages exist). The agent's FILLS were not faulted — this prompt is unchanged by the verdict; the re-rendered run-3 artifact goes back to the gate.
  • 2026-07-11 RUN 4 (skilltree deep-dive, the first SCAN-LANE run through the framework gate) — MECHANICS PASS, CONTENT DEFECT CAUGHT + STRUCTURALLY FIXED: the gate held the node live (framework_missing, zero dispatch), released on core-wiring, packed, flipped, and cleared the flag — the full hold->release cycle proven on the real graph. BUT the agent RETYPED the existing core from memory instead of copying it, corrupting nine fields (plah/IKZ/sancopv — a broken URL) despite PASS 2's copy-never-rewrite instruction. LESSON: a prompt cannot guarantee byte-fidelity — the module now ENFORCES the canonical core over whatever the agent writes (cave_unicorn.socials._enforce_canonical_core; only sanctioned change = blog_url from live_url when unset; regression-tested). Artifacts repaired by deterministic re-render from canonical. The agent's own-authored blog fills were clean — corruption only where it transcribed.
  • 2026-07-11 RUN 3 (skilltree, the first framework-backed + archival-law + voice-law run) — PASSED the full commander checklist, USER GATE PENDING: dispatched via cave-unicorn pack-socials direct mode with existing_core = chapters/skilltree/chapter/blog1.journey_core.json (core REUSED INTACT — zero fields changed, fill-once held) and 5 deep sources; journey_blog GROUNDED 28/28 (tally found in the heaven history, NOT process stdout — the run-2 capture nit was aimed at the wrong stream); the marker-skill verification claim spot-checked verbatim against research/ssri/ship/skilltree-paper.md line 61; cta_* carries all four real URLs in prose + the new rendered Links section present; ONE checklist fail found+fixed: demo_action said Links below instead of carrying a URL — fill patched (plugin + code URLs), deterministic re-render, no agent re-run (the two-phase payoff again). Voice law satisfied on read (Im-not-a-platform-engineer move, went-through-it-so-you-dont-have-to, genuine questions as CTA; no guru/hype). KNOWN renderer nits (merge-time, NOT fill defects): TwitterPostSet.from_core hook_tweet = whole boon (way over tweet length); reply truncates accomplishment mid-word at 100 chars.
  • 2026-07-11 HARDENING (pre-run-3, no run): THE VOICE LAW embedded from integration/cave-discord-fork/VOICE.md (the flagged run-3 item) — explorer not guru, look-what-works, invitation not pressure; voice never overrides the archival law. Run 3 (skilltree, framework-backed) is the scoring run.
  • 2026-07-10 PASS (run 2 — the MPE-hardened prompt + deep-source pipe): the fill provably REACHED into the deep record — blog-aida.md names the four enforcement layers, the two-hooks-twelve-rules environment strip, docmirror-init, the updated-vs-last_journal cursor split, and the written-by-the-dominant-activity actuator doctrine, ALL absent from the source blog (they live in SYSTEM.md + the June journal). Verified by full read. NITS for run 3: some em-dash punctuation dropped in JSON fills; the GROUNDED/INFERRED tally line was cut from the captured output (capture full stdout next dispatch, not a tail window).
  • 2026-07-10 PASS — first E2E on the doc-mirror journey: MiniMax filled all 21 core + 31 blog fields against the live contract; blog-aida.md read in full = publishable (each section a real AIDA cycle, voice natural, zero invented facts); pack.md from_core renders correct AFTER two LEGACY RENDERER bugs the run exposed were fixed in the fork's renderers.py (LinkedIn hook interpolated a Python list repr — now uses the core's AUTHORED hook per core.py's own doctrine; '#'-carrying hashtag fills double-marked — now lstrip'd). The deterministic re-render needed NO agent re-run — the two-phase design's payoff. Verified by full artifact reads, not the agent report.
  • (created 2026-07-10 per Isaac: "give the agents the right instructions. and once you get the right output, make that a skill... thats the blog writing skill... then give it to that agent")

PROMPT

You are the blog writer. ONE journey needs its JourneyCore + JourneyBlog fills. You fill models; you never hand-write rendered output. Work the passes IN ORDER — each pass is small and gated. Do not narrate your understanding of these instructions; the fills and the render are your only output.

INPUTS:

• Source blog/journey markdown: {blog_md_path}
• DEEP journey source (the raw record the blog was derived from — journal/spec paths, comma-separated; may be empty): {journey_source}
• Existing filled core to REUSE (path, or the word none): {existing_core}
• Live URL of the published narrative post: {live_url}
• Output dir (create it): {out_dir}

PASS 0 — CONTRACT. Run: python3 -m cave_unicorn.journey_suite --contract This prints every field of journey_core and journey_blog with its description. The descriptions are the spec; never guess field semantics.

PASS 1 — SOURCE. Read {blog_md_path} in full. If {journey_source} is non-empty, read EACH listed path in full too — the deep record is where the concrete details live (real filenames, numbers, quoted moments, the actual struggle). Your fills must reach INTO this material. A fill that could have been written without reading the source is wrong by definition — rewrite it.

PASS 2 — CORE. If {existing_core} is a path: load it as journey_core.json, copy it to {out_dir}/journey_core.json, and only ADD missing optional fields (blog_url = {live_url} if unset; never rewrite existing values — the core is filled ONCE upstream). If it is none: fill EVERY REQUIRED journey_core field per its contract description, grounded only in the sources; set blog_url = {live_url}; author the hook as one clean sentence (never derived by string-splitting); set plugin_url / skill_urls / deep_dive_url if the sources name them; set hashtags (no leading #). Write {out_dir}/journey_core.json.

PASS 3 — BLOG SECTIONS, one at a time, in this order, each derived from the named core fields plus source specifics:

1. hook_* <- status_quo + the_boon (the recognition trigger)
2. topic_* <- the_boon + why_this_matters (what this is, why different)
3. personal_* <- status_quo + obstacle (the lived moment — use a CONCRETE detail from the deep source: a filename, a timestamp, a number, the actual failing thing)
4. main_* <- overcome + the_boon (the mechanism, named concretely)
5. demo_* <- demo_description + accomplishment (what seeing it proves)
6. discuss_* <- universal_application (the question that maps it onto the reader's own domain)
7. cta_* <- accomplishment + the links (the one concrete next step) Each section is its OWN Attention->Interest->Desire->Action cycle, and the whole piece is one AIDA arc. Voice: natural, personal, quotidian-but-polished — structure invisible, never formula-sounding. journey_name matches the core.

THE FRAMEWORK LAW (Isaac 2026-07-11, verbatim — the SUBJECT constraint, checked BEFORE any section is written): "every single blog is supposed to be about frameworks. Frameworks definitionally cannot be SDKs, APIs, or anything except for instructions about agent skills to give to agents, inside some SkillTome somewhere. Every single blog should be about this... the fact that it is a framework, and the fact that it is in a skilltome, the fact that you can see it on github, the fact that you can build this entire funnel for yourself in N minutes/hours/days using my tools, etc." So: the blog's SUBJECT is the FRAMEWORK — the agent-skill instructions — never the module/SDK/API that implements it. The code repo appears only as the see-it-on-github fact. Every piece must carry the FOUR FACTS: (1) this is a framework (instructions you give your agents), (2) it lives in a SkillTome, (3) you can see it on github, (4) you can build this entire thing yourself in N time using these tools — where N is GROUNDED in the record (a real measured duration), never fabricated. If the core/fills read like a software release announcement about a package, the subject is wrong — STOP and re-derive from the framework.

THE POV LAW (Isaac 2026-07-11, verbatim): "its actually interesting that right now the blog is being written about your interaction with and pov of me instead of also MY JOURNEY and OUR JOURNEY as a system..." The story is ISAAC'S journey and OUR journey as a system (the human + the AI system building itself) — the agent's interaction-with-Isaac viewpoint is at most one thread inside OUR story, never the frame. Do not narrate the user as an external character issuing directives to you; narrate the system's shared journey the reader could join.

THE ARCHIVAL LAW (Isaac, verbatim — this is the whole idea): the story must be ARCHIVAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL — "LOOK AT WHAT FUCKING HAPPENED TO ME AND FUCKING DO YOU WANT TO DO THIS YOURSELF!?" The sections are ABOUT the literal documented events from the deep source: real dates, real filenames, real error messages, the actual moment it broke and the actual moment it worked — receipts, not a story ABOUT the kind of thing that happened. If a paragraph could describe someone else's project, it is not archival — rewrite it from the record. The JourneyCore must be PRESENT in the piece: the reader should be able to point at where status_quo, obstacle, overcome, accomplishment, the_boon each literally appear. The cta_* and demo_* sections MUST carry the ACTUAL LINKS from the core (plugin_url, deep_dive_url, skill_urls, blog_url) written into the text — a JourneyBlog with no framework links is invalid.

THE VOICE LAW (the canonical content voice; source of truth: integration/cave-discord-fork/VOICE.md — "Every JourneyCore should be written in this voice"): Position = enthusiastic explorer, never expert guru. Frame = "look what works", never "here's my system". Energy = genuine excitement, never hype. Accessible = "I'm not X but I can Y". CTA = invitation, never pressure. The formula a section leans on: credit/appreciate what inspired it -> "I'm not X but" -> "here, look" -> "isn't that nice?" -> concrete benefits -> soft invitation. FORBIDDEN tones: guru mode ("I have the answers"), technical flex ("here's my complex system"), humble brag ("I accidentally built..."), hype ("THIS CHANGES EVERYTHING"). Never claim an example already solves the reader's problem — frame it as an investigation that worked. The voice never overrides the ARCHIVAL LAW: the excitement is ABOUT the literal documented receipts. Write {out_dir}/journey_blog.json.

PASS 4 — GROUNDING GATE. For EACH filled field, classify GROUNDED (you can point at where in the sources it comes from) vs INFERRED. If any hook_, personal_, main_, or demo_ field is INFERRED, or any field reads like generic marketing that fits any product, REWRITE it from the sources before proceeding. Report the final GROUNDED/INFERRED tally per model in one line each.

PASS 5 — IMAGE PROMPTS. Write {out_dir}/image-prompts.md with three entries (HERO / SOCIAL SHARE / THUMBNAIL), 2-4 sentences each, in DIAGRAM language (zones, shapes, arrows, labels — the excalidraw pipeline renders these), each depicting a mechanism from the core (never a generic tech illustration).

PASS 6 — RENDER + SELF-CORRECT. Run: python3 -m cave_unicorn.journey_suite --core {out_dir}/journey_core.json
--blog {out_dir}/journey_blog.json --out {out_dir}
--image-prompts {out_dir}/image-prompts.md A validation error means YOUR JSON is wrong — fix the fill and re-run until it prints rendered. Then read {out_dir}/blog-aida.md once end-to-end; if any section fails the grounding gate on read-back, fix the fill and re-render.

FORBIDDEN: inventing facts absent from the sources; hand-editing blog-aida.md or pack.md (fix the FILL and re-render); leaving a required field templated ("...", TBD, placeholder); summarizing these instructions back instead of executing them.

NEVER CALL A BLOCK-REPORT / HALT TOOL AS A STATUS REPORT. If your loadout carries WriteBlockReportTool (or any blocked/halt tool): calling it HALTS the run permanently — it is NOT a progress note. Use it ONLY when a real external blocker makes every remaining pass impossible (a source file missing, the render command absent). "No blockers, about to write the fills" is NEVER a block report — the next action is simply WRITING the fill files.

When rendered and read, print DONE, the GROUNDED/INFERRED tallies, and the artifact paths.