Prompt file imported from Javier-Godon/dlq-streaming (.github/prompts/review-architecture.prompt.md). Copyright stays with the author.

Prompt: Review Railway Architecture Compliance

Name: review-architecture
Author: Javier-Godon

Review the current changes for compliance with the portable Railway-Oriented Java/Spring Boot architecture.

Scope:
{files, module, PR, or git diff range}

Use these rules:
- `.github/copilot-instructions.md`
- `.github/AI_QUICK_REFERENCE.md`
- Relevant `.github/instructions/*.instructions.md`

Report findings grouped as:

CRITICAL — must fix before merge
- Result/ROP violations
- eager transaction boundary
- hidden transaction boundary
- @Transactional in forbidden layer
- JPA relationship annotations
- primitive business fields in domain aggregates/entities/policies
- cross-context direct domain imports
- missing mandatory tests

WARNING — should fix
- weak naming
- unclear stage responsibility
- missing docs
- missing tenant isolation tests
- oversized DTO/event

INFO — improvement ideas
- refactoring suggestions
- simplifications

For every finding include:
- file path
- symbol or line reference if known
- why it violates the rule
- concrete fix

If you edit code, run compile and scoped tests after fixes.

{ "prompt": "# Prompt: Review Railway Architecture Compliance\n\n```text\nReview the current changes for compliance with the portable Railway-Oriented Java/Spring Boot architecture.\n\nScope:\n{files, module, PR, or git diff range}\n\nUse these rules:\n- `.github/copilot-instructions.md`\n- `.github/AI_QUICK_REFERENCE.md`\n- Relevant `.github/instructions/*.instructions.md`\n\nReport findings grouped as:\n\nCRITICAL — must fix before merge\n- Result/ROP violations\n- eager transaction boundary\n- hidden transaction boundary\n- @Transactional in forbidden layer\n- JPA relationship annotations\n- primitive business fields in domain aggregates/entities/policies\n- cross-context direct domain imports\n- missing mandatory tests\n\nWARNING — should fix\n- weak naming\n- unclear stage responsibility\n- missing docs\n- missing tenant isolation tests\n- oversized DTO/event\n\nINFO — improvement ideas\n- refactoring suggestions\n- simplifications\n\nFor every finding include:\n- file path\n- symbol or line reference if known\n- why it violates the rule\n- concrete fix\n\nIf you edit code, run compile and scoped tests after fixes.\n```", "variables": [], "notes": "Scope: {files, module, PR, or git diff range}", "metadata": { "source": { "provider": "github-prompts", "repository": "https://github.com/Javier-Godon/dlq-streaming", "path": ".github/prompts/review-architecture.prompt.md", "ref": "9939fdf2bf503372fc0b9889d94321dbee0752bd", "url": "https://github.com/Javier-Godon/dlq-streaming/blob/9939fdf2bf503372fc0b9889d94321dbee0752bd/.github/prompts/review-architecture.prompt.md", "key": "Javier-Godon/dlq-streaming/.github/prompts/review-architecture.prompt.md" } } }

review-architecture

About

Prompt: Review Railway Architecture Compliance

Use it

Manifest

Reviews