ensemble-vote

Name: ensemble-vote
Author: gr1m0h

Execute ensemble voting with multiple reasoning paths for important decisions. Use when user says "ensemble vote", "multi-perspective analysis", "get multiple opinions", or facing high-risk architectu

by gr1m0h(0) 0 installs

Free

Free account. Installing gives you the manifest plus copy-paste snippets.

See reviews

About

Imported from gr1m0h/dot (home/.claude/skills/ensemble-vote/SKILL.md). Install upstream with npx skills add gr1m0h/dot --skill ensemble-vote. Copyright stays with the author.

Ensemble Voting

Executes a Self-Consistency Ensemble vote for the decision on $ARGUMENTS.

Process

Launch the ensemble-reasoner agent
Generate 5 different reasoning paths
Tally voting results
Report the final judgment with confidence score

Usage Examples

> /ensemble-vote Is this authentication system design secure?
> /ensemble-vote What is the optimal database indexing strategy?
> /ensemble-vote Is this refactoring worthwhile?

Use it

Copy one of these into your project. Installing also returns the manifest and these snippets.

# after Install: the listing is in your workspace's routing pool - a plan picks it for its slot
curl -s -X POST https://api.opensmartroute.ai/api/v1/route -H 'Authorization: Bearer $OSR_API_KEY' -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d '{"text": "...", "plan": true}'

Manifest

An Open Capability Manifest: the router reads it to know what this does, what it costs and when to pick it.

gr1m0h-dot-ensemble-vote.ocm.jsonjson

{
  "ocm": "1",
  "id": "gr1m0h-dot-ensemble-vote",
  "kind": "skill",
  "name": "ensemble-vote",
  "description": "Execute ensemble voting with multiple reasoning paths for important decisions. Use when user says \"ensemble vote\", \"multi-perspective analysis\", \"get multiple opinions\", or facing high-risk architectural or design choices.",
  "publisher": "gr1m0h",
  "version": "1.0.0",
  "capabilities": {
    "domains": [
      "general"
    ],
    "tags": [
      "skill-md",
      "github"
    ],
    "languages": [
      "en"
    ]
  },
  "quality_prior": 0.6,
  "examples": [
    "Execute ensemble voting with multiple reasoning paths for important decisions. Use when user says \"ensemble vote\", \"multi-perspective analysis\", \"get multiple opinions\", or facing high-risk architectural or design choices."
  ],
  "primary": false,
  "metadata": {
    "source": {
      "provider": "github",
      "repository": "https://github.com/gr1m0h/dot",
      "path": "home/.claude/skills/ensemble-vote/SKILL.md",
      "ref": "36b4d9cf48cead7a414ce344d347cdc03f232606",
      "url": "https://github.com/gr1m0h/dot/blob/36b4d9cf48cead7a414ce344d347cdc03f232606/home/.claude/skills/ensemble-vote/SKILL.md",
      "key": "gr1m0h/dot/home/.claude/skills/ensemble-vote/SKILL.md"
    },
    "allowed_tools": [
      "Read,",
      "Grep,",
      "Glob"
    ]
  },
  "instructions": "# Ensemble Voting\n\nExecutes a Self-Consistency Ensemble vote for the decision on $ARGUMENTS.\n\n## Process\n\n1. Launch the ensemble-reasoner agent\n2. Generate 5 different reasoning paths\n3. Tally voting results\n4. Report the final judgment with confidence score\n\n## Usage Examples\n\n```\n> /ensemble-vote Is this authentication system design secure?\n> /ensemble-vote What is the optimal database indexing strategy?\n> /ensemble-vote Is this refactoring worthwhile?\n```",
  "cost": {
    "context_tokens": 115
  }
}

Fetch it by URL: GET /api/v1/registry/gr1m0h-dot-ensemble-vote/manifest?version=1.0.0