Prompt file imported from dkhedekar-cci/SDD-Assignment (.github/prompts/speckit.judgespec.prompt.md). Copyright stays with the author.

judgespec.md

Name: speckit.judgespec
Author: dkhedekar-cci

Purpose

Evaluate a generated spec.md from a QA perspective.

Evaluation Criteria

Score each category from 1-5.

Category Check

Completeness All requirements captured Correctness Matches source requirements Clarity Unambiguous language Testability QA can derive test cases Business Rules Explicitly documented Validation Rules Positive/negative cases covered Edge Cases Boundary/error scenarios included Acceptance Criteria Clear and measurable Assumptions Clearly separated Open Questions Missing information identified

Review Checklist

No implementation details.
No invented business logic.
Consistent terminology.
Markdown formatting is correct.
Tables are readable.
Suitable for manual and automation testing.

Overall Verdict

PASS
PASS WITH COMMENTS
FAIL

Improvement Recommendations

List all deficiencies with suggested corrections in priority order.

# judgespec.md ## Purpose Evaluate a generated `spec.md` from a QA perspective. ## Evaluation Criteria Score each category from 1-5. Category Check --------------------- ----------------------------------- Completeness All requirements captured Correctness Matches source requirements Clarity Unambiguous language Testability QA can derive test cases Business Rules Explicitly documented Validation Rules Positive/negative cases covered Edge Cases Boundary/error scenarios included Acceptance Criteria Clear and measurable Assumptions Clearly separated Open Questions Missing information identified ## Review Checklist - No implementation details. - No invented business logic. - Consistent terminology. - Markdown formatting is correct. - Tables are readable. - Suitable for manual and automation testing. ## Overall Verdict - PASS - PASS WITH COMMENTS - FAIL ## Improvement Recommendations List all deficiencies with suggested corrections in priority order.

{ "prompt": "# judgespec.md\n\n## Purpose\n\nEvaluate a generated `spec.md` from a QA perspective.\n\n## Evaluation Criteria\n\nScore each category from 1-5.\n\n Category Check\n --------------------- -----------------------------------\n Completeness All requirements captured\n Correctness Matches source requirements\n Clarity Unambiguous language\n Testability QA can derive test cases\n Business Rules Explicitly documented\n Validation Rules Positive/negative cases covered\n Edge Cases Boundary/error scenarios included\n Acceptance Criteria Clear and measurable\n Assumptions Clearly separated\n Open Questions Missing information identified\n\n## Review Checklist\n\n- No implementation details.\n- No invented business logic.\n- Consistent terminology.\n- Markdown formatting is correct.\n- Tables are readable.\n- Suitable for manual and automation testing.\n\n## Overall Verdict\n\n- PASS\n- PASS WITH COMMENTS\n- FAIL\n\n## Improvement Recommendations\n\nList all deficiencies with suggested corrections in priority order.", "variables": [], "notes": "Evaluate a generated `spec.md` from a QA perspective.", "metadata": { "source": { "provider": "github-prompts", "repository": "https://github.com/dkhedekar-cci/SDD-Assignment", "path": ".github/prompts/speckit.judgespec.prompt.md", "ref": "ff11000305915a697050e55962683088efe57dc5", "url": "https://github.com/dkhedekar-cci/SDD-Assignment/blob/ff11000305915a697050e55962683088efe57dc5/.github/prompts/speckit.judgespec.prompt.md", "key": "dkhedekar-cci/SDD-Assignment/.github/prompts/speckit.judgespec.prompt.md" } } }

speckit.judgespec

About

judgespec.md

Purpose

Evaluation Criteria

Review Checklist

Overall Verdict

Improvement Recommendations

Use it

Manifest

Reviews