Imported from agentydragon/ducktape (skills/forgejo/SKILL.md). Install upstream with npx skills add agentydragon/ducktape --skill forgejo. Copyright stays with the author.

Forgejo

Use live Forgejo evidence before inferring from manifests. For private repos, get a real repo credential first and keep it in shell variables; never print tokens or passwords.

Endpoint Discovery

Check the deployment's OpenAPI before guessing:

curl -fsS "$FORGEJO_URL/swagger.v1.json" \
  | jq -r '.paths | keys[] | select(test("actions|packages|repos"))'

This Forgejo deployment exposes Actions metadata under /api/v1/repos/.../actions/.... It does not expose GitHub-compatible REST endpoints for log download or rerun/retry.

Actions Metadata

List runs:

curl -fsS -u "$USER:$PASS" \
  "$FORGEJO_URL/api/v1/repos/$OWNER/$REPO/actions/runs" \
  | jq -r '.workflow_runs[] |
      [.index_in_repo, .id, .workflow_id, .status, .prettyref, .commit_sha[0:9], .title] | @tsv'

Important ID namespaces:

• index_in_repo is the UI/display run number, e.g. /actions/runs/396.
• id is the internal REST run id for GET /api/v1/repos/$OWNER/$REPO/actions/runs/$id.
• actions/tasks returns job/task rows; its id is a task id, not the run id.

List task rows:

curl -fsS -u "$USER:$PASS" \
  "$FORGEJO_URL/api/v1/repos/$OWNER/$REPO/actions/tasks" \
  | jq -r '.workflow_runs[] |
      [.run_number, .id, .name, .workflow_id, .status, .head_branch, .head_sha[0:9], .display_title] | @tsv'

Always inspect event_payload for the actual ref and changed paths:

curl -fsS -u "$USER:$PASS" \
  "$FORGEJO_URL/api/v1/repos/$OWNER/$REPO/actions/runs/$INTERNAL_RUN_ID" \
  | jq -r '.prettyref, .event_payload | fromjson? | {ref, before, after, commits}'

A green run on a non-main branch does not prove a main-gated publish step ran. A green workflow_dispatch run also does not prove the push-triggered path is healthy; compare the event field before using one run to explain another.

Actions CI Timing

The logs subcommand (below) answers "why did this run fail?"; timing answers "why is CI slow?" — a per-job duration distribution over recent tasks. The script is self-contained (PEP 723 inline deps), so uv run fetches httpx + pydantic on the fly; in-repo, bb run //skills/forgejo/scripts:cli -- timing … works too:

uv run skills/forgejo/scripts/forgejo.py timing --owner "$OWNER" --repo "$REPO"
# --list       also prints individual recent tasks
# --limit N    analyze the N most-recent finished tasks (default 200)
# --max-seconds S  drop longer rows as outliers (default 1800, the runner job timeout)

It reads FORGEJO_URL (defaults to this deployment) and authenticates via ~/.netrc (or FORGEJO_USER / FORGEJO_PASSWORD). Sample (haku/haku-state):

job               n    min    p50    p90    max
bazel            37   494s   538s   593s   659s
validate         51   161s   223s   247s   276s
linkcheck        92    20s    61s    72s   131s

A flat min ≈ p50 on every run (no run ever incremental) is the signature of a build with no persistent cache.

Manual equivalent — duration is updated_at - run_started_at, per finished task:

curl -fsS -u "$USER:$PASS" "$FORGEJO_URL/api/v1/repos/$OWNER/$REPO/actions/tasks" \
  | jq -r '.workflow_runs[]
      | select(.status=="success" or .status=="failure")
      | [.name, ((.updated_at|fromdateiso8601) - (.run_started_at|fromdateiso8601) | floor)]
      | @tsv'

Timing-field gotchas on this deployment (they bite a naive reading):

• No conclusion, no stopped_at. status carries success/failure/cancelled/running; updated_at is the completion time of a finished task.
• The start field is run_started_at, not started_at — there is no started_at, so reading it silently yields null and drops every row.
• Duration is run + queue wall time. The runner is capacity-limited, so a row can sit queued before it runs; treat a long tail as queue wait and filter outliers (the helper's --max-seconds).
• limit is ignored — the endpoint returns the whole task list under workflow_runs; slice client-side.

Logs

On this deployment, logs are web UI endpoints, not documented REST routes. Treat these routes as Forgejo UI implementation details: discover the current URL shape from the run page each time, prefer page-provided attributes over hardcoded IDs, and expect this recipe to need adjustment after Forgejo upgrades. REST Basic auth is enough for /api/v1/..., but not for the web log endpoints. Start a temporary web session with the same credential:

Prefer the bundled helper when you need logs:

# List step indexes from the run page.
uv run skills/forgejo/scripts/forgejo.py logs \
  --owner "$OWNER" --repo "$REPO" --run "$RUN_NUMBER" --list-steps

# Fetch one expanded step's log.
uv run skills/forgejo/scripts/forgejo.py logs \
  --owner "$OWNER" --repo "$REPO" --run "$RUN_NUMBER" --step "$STEP_INDEX"

The helper logs in, fetches the run page, parses the page-provided data-* attributes, and posts the UI's JSON cursor payload. Keep credentials in environment variables or temporary shell variables (FORGEJO_URL, FORGEJO_USER, FORGEJO_PASSWORD); do not print them.

Manual equivalent:

cookie=$(mktemp)
curl -fsS -c "$cookie" "$FORGEJO_URL/user/login" -o /tmp/forgejo-login.html
csrf=$(rg -o 'name="_csrf" value="([^"]+)"' -r '$1' /tmp/forgejo-login.html | head -1)
curl -fsS -L -b "$cookie" -c "$cookie" -o /tmp/forgejo-after-login.html \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded' \
  --data-urlencode "_csrf=$csrf" \
  --data-urlencode "user_name=$USER" \
  --data-urlencode "password=$PASS" \
  "$FORGEJO_URL/user/login"

Fetch the run page using the UI/display run number, then read the attributes the Vue app uses:

curl -fsS -L -b "$cookie" \
  "$FORGEJO_URL/$OWNER/$REPO/actions/runs/$RUN_NUMBER" \
  -o /tmp/forgejo-run.html

On this deployment the relevant HTML attributes are:

• data-actions-url, e.g. /haku/haku-state/actions
• data-run-index, the UI run number
• data-job-index, zero-based index in the run's job list
• data-attempt-number
• data-initial-post-response, JSON-escaped initial job state containing step indexes, statuses, and the UI job ids

To pull one step's log, POST JSON to the same endpoint the UI uses:

endpoint="$FORGEJO_URL${ACTIONS_URL}/runs/${RUN_INDEX}/jobs/${JOB_INDEX}/attempt/${ATTEMPT}"
curl -fsS -L -b "$cookie" -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  --data '{"logCursors":[{"step":STEP_INDEX,"cursor":null,"expanded":true}]}' \
  "$endpoint" \
  | jq -r '.logs.stepsLog[] | .lines[] | [.timestamp, .message] | @tsv'

Notes:

• jobs/$JOB_INDEX is the zero-based UI job index, not the REST task id and not the UI job id embedded in data-initial-post-response.
• The deployment's OpenAPI currently exposes GET for Actions runs but no documented rerun or retry endpoint. If you need to rerun a job, discover the web UI endpoint from the page or trigger a new workflow/commit intentionally.
• The download link in the gear menu is $ACTIONS_URL/runs/$RUN_INDEX/jobs/$JOB_INDEX/attempt/$ATTEMPT/logs, but the JSON POST is better for targeted diagnostics and works with expanded-step cursors.
• If the POST returns an empty stepsLog, expand the failing step by index. The initial page state lists each step summary/status under state.currentJob.steps.
• Some repos also publish fallback logs, e.g. a ci-logs branch or workflow artifact; check workflow comments before assuming web logs are the only channel.

Actions Artifacts

Verified on this deployment (Forgejo 15.0.3+gitea-1.22.0, probe 2026-07-12; byte-identical sha256 round-trip).

Upload, in workflows: actions/upload-artifact@v4 fails with GHESNotSupportedError — the GitHub action refuses any non-github.com host. Use https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/upload-artifact@v4 (preferred, v4 semantics) or actions/upload-artifact@v3.

Download: no REST endpoints (/api/v1/.../actions/artifacts and .../actions/runs/$ID/artifacts both 404, and Basic auth on the web routes also 404s) — web session only (login recipe under Logs above). Gotcha: the two web routes key on different run identifiers, both available from GET /api/v1/repos/$OWNER/$REPO/actions/runs (id = DB id, index_in_repo = UI/display run number; the tasks endpoint's url field also embeds the display number):

# List (display run number): -> {"artifacts":[{name,size,status}]}
curl -fsS -b "$cookie" "$FORGEJO_URL/$OWNER/$REPO/actions/runs/$RUN_INDEX/artifacts"

# Download (DB id! the display number here returns 404 "no such run").
# The response is always a ZIP wrapping the uploaded file(s).
curl -fsS -b "$cookie" -o artifact.zip \
  "$FORGEJO_URL/$OWNER/$REPO/actions/runs/$RUN_DB_ID/artifacts/$ARTIFACT_NAME"
unzip artifact.zip

Actions Secrets And Registry Auth

Forgejo Actions secret metadata is deliberately opaque. GET /api/v1/repos/$OWNER/$REPO/actions/secrets proves a secret exists, but it does not reveal the value and may not include a useful updated_at. Do not conclude a registry credential was refreshed from that listing alone. Verify with behavior: an authenticated registry probe such as /v2/, a workflow preflight step, or a real image push.

When diagnosing image publishes, compare registry responses:

curl -sS -o /tmp/registry-probe.json -w '%{http_code}\n' \
  -u "$REGISTRY_USER:$REGISTRY_PASSWORD" \
  "$FORGEJO_URL/v2/"

On this deployment, valid haku credentials return 200 for /v2/; empty or wrong passwords return 401. A workflow-only 403 points at the exact Actions context or generated Docker auth config, not at the registry being globally down.

haku-state CI And UI Rollout

For haku/haku-state, the useful read credential is haku-forgejo-git from haku-sandbox. Use it for API reads; do not use scratch tokens.

Distinguish the two CI surfaces:

• validate-state.yaml green means the current main data contract is valid. It does not build or publish haku-ui.
• bazel-ci.yaml on main is the image publish path. Path filters mean data-only commits do not run it.

To answer "is a UI change live?", verify the whole chain:

1. bazel-ci.yaml ran on main for the UI commit, not only on a PR or wip/*.
2. The registry has a matching git.allegedly.works/haku/ui:main-<utc>-<sha7> tag.
3. ImageRepository/haku-ui scanned that tag.
4. ImagePolicy/haku-ui selected it.
5. ImageUpdateAutomation/haku-ui committed the tag into haku-state.
6. Kustomization/haku-state-workloads applied that revision.
7. Deployment/haku-ui is running the selected image and the served bundle contains the expected UI strings/routes.

If there is no registry tag for the UI commit, this is a CI/publish problem, not Flux lag. If the latest green run is only validate-state.yaml, the branch badge can be green while the UI remains stale.