While end-to-end benchmarks like SWE-bench provide broad performance scores for AI agents, they are often expensive, slow, and lack the root-cause diagnostics needed to explain exactly where an agent's logic broke down. To solve this, developers should adopt behavioral evaluations—fast, local, unit-style tests that assert on discrete intermediate actions, such as verifying specific tool calls or file modifications rather than final string equality. By building these inexpensive micro-checks alongside macro benchmarks, engineering teams can confidently iterate on system prompts and upgrade models without the risk of regressions.
Read the original at Google AI developers blog: The Anatomy of Harness Engineering: How to Evaluate, Iterate, and Guard AI Coding Agents